Hi François,
pin...@iro.umontreal.ca (François Pinard) writes:
> This morning, I just noticed this line:
>
> CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 9:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] => 11:44
This should be fixed now, thanks for reporting this.
Best,
--
Bastien
Hi François and Nick,
I have tested this small patch, implementing Nick's solution.
No breakage on my side -- but let's be careful here.
Thanks for testing,
>From 6b2fbed71355f5b37b723e15e7aad20fb4ce3f07 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Bastien Guerry
Date: Sat, 31 Dec 2011 09:39:58 +0100
Subject
François Pinard wrote:
> Hi, Org people.
>
> This morning, I just noticed this line:
>
> CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 9:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] => 11:44
>
> because of the strange 11:44 total. My error is clear, as I wrote 9:30
> instead of 09:30. Correcting it gives a move reasonable total:
>
François Pinard wrote:
> Hi, Org people.
>
> This morning, I just noticed this line:
>
> CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 9:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] => 11:44
>
> because of the strange 11:44 total. My error is clear, as I wrote 9:30
> instead of 09:30. Correcting it gives a move reasonable total:
>
Hi, Org people.
This morning, I just noticed this line:
CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 9:30]--[2011-12-29 jeu 11:44] => 11:44
because of the strange 11:44 total. My error is clear, as I wrote 9:30
instead of 09:30. Correcting it gives a move reasonable total:
CLOCK: [2011-12-29 jeu 09:30]--[2011-12-2
