Am 14.12.2017 um 16:39 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Rainer Stengele writes:
I am concerned hearing you say "sheer luck" because I am relying on such double
entries, which seem to have worked well in the past:
* TODO [#A] Change tyres spring/autumn
DEADLINE:
Rainer Stengele writes:
> I am concerned hearing you say "sheer luck" because I am relying on such
> double entries, which seem to have worked well in the past:
>
> * TODO [#A] Change tyres spring/autumn
> DEADLINE: <2018-05-01 Di> SCHEDULED: <2018-04-21 Sa +1y>
>
Am 14.12.2017 um 14:41 schrieb Nicolas Goaziou:
Hello,
Rainer Stengele writes:
it looks like
* TODO task
DEADLINE: <2017-12-14 Do>
SCHEDULED: <2017-12-14 Do>
will find the DEADLINE and SCHEDULE timestamp and display correctly in
the agenda while
Sheer luck, I
Hello,
Rainer Stengele writes:
> it looks like
>
> * TODO task
> DEADLINE: <2017-12-14 Do>
> SCHEDULED: <2017-12-14 Do>
>
> will find the DEADLINE and SCHEDULE timestamp and display correctly in
> the agenda while
Sheer luck, I would say.
> * TODO task
> SCHEDULED:
Am 04.09.2017 um 12:21 schrieb Eric S Fraga:
On Monday, 4 Sep 2017 at 12:08, Pdj wrote:
Hello, I am observing this (funky?) behavior:
in the agenda, the deadline seems to be identified only if it
immediately follows the headline, and it is ignored otherwise.
Am I missing something? Thank
On Monday, 4 Sep 2017 at 12:08, Pdj wrote:
> Hello, I am observing this (funky?) behavior:
> in the agenda, the deadline seems to be identified only if it
> immediately follows the headline, and it is ignored otherwise.
> Am I missing something? Thank you, Paolo.
You are not missing something.
Hello, I am observing this (funky?) behavior:
in the agenda, the deadline seems to be identified only if it
immediately follows the headline, and it is ignored otherwise.
Am I missing something? Thank you, Paolo.
1) DEADLINE is identified and used.
** TODO Phone call
DEADLINE: <2017-09-06