Hi Nicolas,
>> I'm trying to define a new emphasis
>
> Please don't. We're in the process of hard-coding emphasis markers.
OK. Understood.
>> that would work like org-code (=) except that it would export to
>> \textsf instead of \texttt in LaTeX.
>
> If that's related to export, you can twea
Hello,
"Francesco Pizzolante" writes:
> My goal is, in fact, to keep the default behavior of the '=' marker and
> redefine
> the behavior of the '~' marker.
>
> I'd like '~' to behave exactly the same way = does but using \textsf instead
> of
> \texttt. Is it possible?
Certainly. Even if we
Hello,
"Francesco Pizzolante"
writes:
> I'm trying to define a new emphasis
Please don't. We're in the process of hard-coding emphasis markers.
> that would work like org-code (=) except that it would export to
> \textsf instead of \texttt in LaTeX.
If that's related to export, you can twe
Hi,
I'm trying to define a new emphasis that would work like org-code (=) except
that it would export to \textsf instead of \texttt in LaTeX.
I tried several combinations using org-emphasis-alist and
org-export-latex-emphasis-alist, but I must admit that I'm lost amongst all
parameters controllin
