Re: [O] Documentation references to htmlize and htmlize vs. htmlfontify

Kaushal Modi writes: > +1 to transition to htmlfontify. Copying Rasmus for comments on > efforts needed to update ox-html to use htmlfontify.. +1! -- Bastien

Re: [O] Documentation references to htmlize and htmlize vs. htmlfontify

On Mon, Jan 8, 2018 at 9:58 AM Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > FWIW, I'm in favour of replacing entirely htmlize with htmlfontify, > since the latter is bundled with Emacs. > There was a discussion on this (htmlize vs htmlfontify) 2 years back on emacs-devel:

Re: [O] Documentation references to htmlize and htmlize vs. htmlfontify

Hello, Tim Landscheidt writes: > Finally, Emacs already ships with htmlfontify. On (non-Org) > files, I see small, but not significant differences between > it and htmlize. Are there features that only htmlize of- > fers? Otherwise it would be very convenient to

[O] Documentation references to htmlize and htmlize vs. htmlfontify

Hi, the Org Mode Manual (here: Emacs master's 9.1.4) refers to htmlize in several places in slightly different ways; for example, in one place it says: | This works automatically for the HTML back-end (it requires | version 1.34 of the ‘htmlize.el’ package, which you need to | install). This is