Ken Williams writes:
> Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes:
>
>> There is no way to customize `org-confirm-evaluate' to achieve this
>> behavior, however it can be accomplished through creative use of the
>> :eval header argument, by using the `org-export-current-backend'
>> variable to inhibit evalu
Eric Schulte gmail.com> writes:
> There is no way to customize `org-confirm-evaluate' to achieve this
> behavior, however it can be accomplished through creative use of the
> :eval header argument, by using the `org-export-current-backend'
> variable to inhibit evaluation during export.
>
> #+be
Eric S Fraga writes:
> writes:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I know from the manual that I can set 'org-confirm-babel-evaluate' to t,
>> or nil, or a function, to control whether I'm asked permission to run a
>> code block.
>>
>> However, that only gives me two choices - ask the user, or pretend the
>> user sa
writes:
> Hi,
>
> I know from the manual that I can set 'org-confirm-babel-evaluate' to t,
> or nil, or a function, to control whether I'm asked permission to run a
> code block.
>
> However, that only gives me two choices - ask the user, or pretend the
> user said "yes". Sometimes I'd like to p
Hi,
I know from the manual that I can set 'org-confirm-babel-evaluate' to t,
or nil, or a function, to control whether I'm asked permission to run a
code block.
However, that only gives me two choices - ask the user, or pretend the
user said "yes". Sometimes I'd like to pretend the user said "no
