* Thomas S. Dye wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> https://github.com/novoid/orgmode-ACM-template
>>
> Hi Karl,
Hi!
> IIUC, you'd like to configure Org-mode to export a LaTeX file that is
> functionally equivalent to sigproc-sp.tex.
Yes. If it is possible, I want to have an equivalent P
* Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Nicolas!
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> * Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>>>
>> Yea, that might be appropriate. So I set up a github repos:
>>
>> https://github.com/novoid/orgmode-ACM-template
>>
>> With the new exporter, I was not able to compile the Org-mode file
Karl Voit writes:
> * Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>>
>> AFAICT, the new exporter preserves most of the interface of the old
>> exporter, but smooths over some of the rough edges. It shouldn't
>> represent a barrier to your contribution. In fact, it might be useful
>> to write a template for both expo
Hello,
Karl Voit writes:
> * Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>>
>> AFAICT, the new exporter preserves most of the interface of the old
>> exporter, but smooths over some of the rough edges. It shouldn't
>> represent a barrier to your contribution. In fact, it might be useful
>> to write a template for b
* Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
> AFAICT, the new exporter preserves most of the interface of the old
> exporter, but smooths over some of the rough edges. It shouldn't
> represent a barrier to your contribution. In fact, it might be useful
> to write a template for both exporters, then document how th
Karl Voit writes:
> * Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>>
>> One of the ideas behind the new exporter is that Org-mode source
>> prepared for one target can be easily exported to other targets.
>
> I see.
>
>> My brief experience with the LaTeX exporter so far has been very
>> positive and I'm relatively
* Thomas S. Dye wrote:
>
> One of the ideas behind the new exporter is that Org-mode source
> prepared for one target can be easily exported to other targets.
I see.
> My brief experience with the LaTeX exporter so far has been very
> positive and I'm relatively certain that it will be the de
