Hello,
Matthias Paulmier writes:
> I think I get the logic behind it. The problem is the inconsistency it
> creates for the viewer. Does it really matter for them if I wrote my
> footnote inline or not?
Inline footnotes are now wrapped within a paragraph. Thank you.
Regards,
--
Nicolas
Hello,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> This is intended, in a way, since the inline footnote is not a paragraph
> by itself. It is contained within a paragraph. This explains why you
> cannot have blank lines within an inline footnote.
I think I get the logic behind it. The problem is the
Hello,
Matthias Paulmier writes:
> I came across this problem today (or maybe it is intended but I couldn't
> find any explanation in the docs). There is an inconsistency on how
> inline/anonymous and named footnotes are exported in HTML. For example,
> with the following source:
>
> #+TITLE:
Hello,
I came across this problem today (or maybe it is intended but I couldn't
find any explanation in the docs). There is an inconsistency on how
inline/anonymous and named footnotes are exported in HTML. For example,
with the following source:
--8<---cut
