abonnements writes:
> When I write my first post i was using version 8.2.7c.
>
> The behaviour of TAB on an #+name: ligne is the same with 8.2.10
> (installed with package-install from elpa)...
>
> Sorry but can you explain me the normal behavour of TAB.
> Thanks.
#+header: test
#+name: test
When I write my first post i was using version 8.2.7c.
The behaviour of TAB on an #+name: ligne is the same with 8.2.10
(installed with package-install from elpa)...
Sorry but can you explain me the normal behavour of TAB.
Thanks.
Le 26/10/2014 13:42, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
abonnements w
abonnements writes:
> Thanks, that's what I supposed.
>
> But when you hit "TAB" on a "#+name: " line it fold the block to the
> "#+end_XXX".
> This is not the case for a "#+header:" line.
I think you're using an outdated Org.
> So such a folding stuff may be easy to implement no?
As I wrote a
Thanks, that's what I supposed.
But when you hit "TAB" on a "#+name: " line it fold the block to the
"#+end_XXX".
This is not the case for a "#+header:" line.
So such a folding stuff may be easy to implement no?
Thierry
Le 26/10/2014 11:19, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
Hello,
abonnements wri
Hello,
abonnements writes:
> I would like to know if there is, or if it is simple, to have a
> "#+STARTUP: hideblocks" like option which allow to fold named blocks
> leaving only the #+name:
>
> Example
> #+name: test
> #+header: :var foo=10
> #+begin_src python
> ...
> #+end_src
>
> is d
Hello,
I would like to know if there is, or if it is simple, to have a
"#+STARTUP: hideblocks" like option which allow to fold named blocks
leaving only the #+name:
Example
#+name: test
#+header: :var foo=10
#+begin_src python
...
#+end_src
is displayed on the opening of the file folded t
