Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz writes:
> Somehow you also seem to have confused the mailing list software about
> the mailing list tag in the subject line: it doesn't correctly strip and
> re-insert it anymore on reply, so you get "Re: [O]" and "[O] Re:" and
> more variations on that theme.
It was a p
On Wed, Mar 2, 2011 at 1:44 PM, Achim Gratz wrote:
> Somehow you also seem to have confused the mailing list software about
> the mailing list tag in the subject line: it doesn't correctly strip and
> re-insert it anymore on reply, so you get "Re: [O]" and "[O] Re:" and
> more variations on that t
Bastien writes:
> Done -- except that I used "-- ", not "__ ".
>
> "-- " is the standard separator for signatures.
Yes, but the mailing list banner is not a signature. You will now have
(by default) two signatures when replying, of which only the mailing
list banner gets stripped by the MUA. Li
Bastien writes:
> Hi Eric,
>
> "Eric Schulte" writes:
>
>> While there are changes to the administration of the mailing list.
>> Would it be difficult to change the list signature from
>>
>> : ___
>> : Emacs-orgmode mailing list
>> : Please use `Reply
Hi Eric,
"Eric Schulte" writes:
> While there are changes to the administration of the mailing list.
> Would it be difficult to change the list signature from
>
> : ___
> : Emacs-orgmode mailing list
> : Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the li
Another issue with splitting is the problem of archiving.
Looking for problems, solutions, hacks and code in one single mailing
list has proven very useful so far -- I want to keep that.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 28/02/2011 18:09, Eric Schulte wrote:
>
> (but don't have any reference) that the "-- "
> string is the standard signature delimiter, and it would result in at
> least gnus, and probably other mailing agents, stripping the signature
> from replies
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 12:53 PM, Dan Davison wrote:
> Julien Danjou writes:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>>
>> The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
>> they will forget (I will), and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I
>
> Hi Julien,
>
> No, I
> DEV threads often start life as USER threads;
For example, org-odt.el.
Jambunathan K.
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/emacs-orgmode
Julien Danjou writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>
> The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
> they will forget (I will), and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I
Hi Julien,
No, I disagree with that. The two lists would have distinct compositions
While there are changes to the administration of the mailing list.
Would it be difficult to change the list signature from
: ___
: Emacs-orgmode mailing list
: Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
: Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
: http://lists.gnu
Julien Danjou writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
>
> The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
> they will forget (I will),
I disagree, [babel] tags have been working very well for some time now,
even if the original poster forgets to add such a tag it o
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
The point is that there's no gain in telling people to add "[DEV]" since
they will forget (I will), and there is _no_ lose by splitting a list. I
already splitted user list in some project and nothing bad happened. :)
> Julien, I guess your life would be easier
Dear all,
thanks all for your input.
Let's stick to one list for now, and let's try to use the [DEV] tag for
emails that only target development. It's not automatic and people will
forget sometimes, but on the overrall this will improve the readability
of the list, for both developers and users.
14 matches
Mail list logo
