Nicolas Goaziou writes:
Hello,
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> Your function could be implemented along the line of:
>>
>> 1. put an 'after' advice on `org-toggle-checkbox'
>
> See also `org-checkbox-statistics-hook'
>
>> Its easy to get 'struct at point' with
>>
>> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
>> (de
Hello,
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> Your function could be implemented along the line of:
>
> 1. put an 'after' advice on `org-toggle-checkbox'
See also `org-checkbox-statistics-hook'
> Its easy to get 'struct at point' with
>
> #+begin_src emacs-lisp
> (defun org-list-struct ()
> "Return struc
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> I have the folowing:
> * Actions
- [X] A
- [ ] B
- [ ] C
>
> When on A I give ‘C-c C-c’ I get:
> * Actions
> - [X] A
> - [ ] B
> - [ ] C
>
> but I would like to get:
> * Actions
> - [ ] B
> - [ ] C
> - [X] A
>
> Is this possible?
> If not I could write an
2014/1/22 Cecil Westerhof
> >> but I would like to get:
>
>> >> * Actions
>> >> - [ ] B
>> >> - [ ] C
>> >> - [X] A
>> >>
>> >> Is this possible?
>> >
>> > `C-c ^ x' to sort the list by checkbox status.
>> >
>> > But this is an additional step after ticking the checkbox.
>> >
>> >> If not I
2014/1/22 Nicolas Goaziou
> >> but I would like to get:
> >> * Actions
> >> - [ ] B
> >> - [ ] C
> >> - [X] A
> >>
> >> Is this possible?
> >
> > `C-c ^ x' to sort the list by checkbox status.
> >
> > But this is an additional step after ticking the checkbox.
> >
> >> If not I could write a
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> Cecil Westerhof writes:
>
>> but I would like to get:
>> * Actions
>> - [ ] B
>> - [ ] C
>> - [X] A
>>
>> Is this possible?
>
> `C-c ^ x' to sort the list by checkbox status.
>
> But this is an additional step after ticking the checkbox.
>
>> If not I could write
Hi Cecil,
Cecil Westerhof writes:
> but I would like to get:
> * Actions
> - [ ] B
> - [ ] C
> - [X] A
>
> Is this possible?
`C-c ^ x' to sort the list by checkbox status.
But this is an additional step after ticking the checkbox.
> If not I could write an alias for it I think. Is there
I have the folowing:
* Actions
- [ ] A
- [ ] B
- [ ] C
When on A I give ‘C-c C-c’ I get:
* Actions
- [X] A
- [ ] B
- [ ] C
but I would like to get:
* Actions
- [ ] B
- [ ] C
- [X] A
Is this possible?
If not I could write an alias for it I think. Is there a command for going
to
