Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 8:03 PM, Bernt Hansen wrote: > John Hendy writes: > >> I got food feedback as far as the "snapshots" inquiry, but am still >> not settled on the time vs. topic hierarchy strategy (definite thanks >> to Bernt and Eric Fraga!). I thought of a specific situation that >> might

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

John Hendy writes: > I got food feedback as far as the "snapshots" inquiry, but am still > not settled on the time vs. topic hierarchy strategy (definite thanks > to Bernt and Eric Fraga!). I thought of a specific situation that > might help with receiving feedback. > > I think were I solely work

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

I got food feedback as far as the "snapshots" inquiry, but am still not settled on the time vs. topic hierarchy strategy (definite thanks to Bernt and Eric Fraga!). I thought of a specific situation that might help with receiving feedback. I think were I solely working as an individual, the struct

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

John Hendy writes: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: [...] >> In terms of the original questions, I use a combination of hierarchical >> structure that is filled in as a project develops, with >> revision control to allow me to see progress, together with a log based >> re

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

John Hendy writes: > On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: >> >> The key, as John has already stated, is to record everything!  With >> emacs, I can usually pull out what I want *if* the information was >> recorded in the first place. >> >> Finally, tags can be very useful for qui

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

On Mon, Jan 23, 2012 at 3:00 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote: > Max Mikhanosha writes: > >> At Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:04:51 -0600, >> John Hendy wrote: > > [...] > >> Generally I think the way to tackle this is to take advantage that you >> are working with plain text and not with Word document, and use >> s

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

Max Mikhanosha writes: > At Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:04:51 -0600, > John Hendy wrote: [...] > Generally I think the way to tackle this is to take advantage that you > are working with plain text and not with Word document, and use > standard Emacs/Unix tools for working with text. Agreed! > Some i

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

At Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:59:38 -0500, Max Mikhanosha wrote: > > Go to Project 1, press, C-c C-x b (this will create indirect buffer > "Project 1-1"), then go to draft 2 tree, and do same thing. If you did > not edit the title, it will reuse the indirect buffer name, since its > titled after the head

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

At Sat, 21 Jan 2012 07:59:38 -0500, Max Mikhanosha wrote: > If you do this "copy the project" thing once a week or so, you can > have a nice ediff of the project's progress along the time-line. > > Actually it may not be a bad idea to implement M-x > org-ediff-subtree-with-sibling command, that w

Re: [O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

At Fri, 20 Jan 2012 12:04:51 -0600, John Hendy wrote: > > I use org-mode for all of my work notes. For the most part, I'm very > happy with it. I know everything is in there somewhere and I can find > it. I currently have one file for my projects organized something like > this: > > > * Project

[O] Organizing by time or by subject and an idea

I use org-mode for all of my work notes. For the most part, I'm very happy with it. I know everything is in there somewhere and I can find it. I currently have one file for my projects organized something like this: #+begin_src org * Tracking This is for misc todos. It's just a repo for holding