Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Oh, yes, of course. Feel free to apply it on master then.
>
> Done.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Bastien writes:
> Oh, yes, of course. Feel free to apply it on master then.
Done.
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
>> (The patch does not apply on maint anymore though :/...)
>
> It never applied to maint. It was built on top of master. ISTR some
> features don't exist in maint (is it :post header?).
Oh, yes, of course. Feel free to apply it on master then.
Thanks!
--
Hello,
Bastien writes:
> (The patch does not apply on maint anymore though :/...)
It never applied to maint. It was built on top of master. ISTR some
features don't exist in maint (is it :post header?).
Regards,
--
Nicolas Goaziou
Hi Nicolas,
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> The attached patch should fix the issue. Could you confirm it?
I just tested and it fixes the issue.
I'll Jarmo double-confirm this.
(The patch does not apply on maint anymore though :/...)
Thanks in advance for apply it!
--
Bastien
Hello,
Jarmo Hurri writes:
> The following code evaluates just fine with C-c C-c, but fails during
> export. This is with the newest org-mode just pulled and built. How do I
> fix the issue?
>
> # ---
> Here is a function I want
Hi Jarmo,
Jarmo Hurri writes:
> Need to repost my own question (below), since there was no response to
> this.
I confirm this weird bug but could not find a fix yet.
This is on my watch-list,
--
Bastien
Hi again.
Need to repost my own question (below), since there was no response to
this.
All the best,
Jarmo
> The following code evaluates just fine with C-c C-c, but fails during
> export. This is with the newest org-mode just pulled and built. How do I
> fix the issue?
>
> # -
Greetings.
The following code evaluates just fine with C-c C-c, but fails during
export. This is with the newest org-mode just pulled and built. How do I
fix the issue?
# ---
Here is a function I want to define (use below), but
