On Friday, 10 Mar 2017 at 13:21, Julian M. Burgos wrote:
> Do'oh! It wasn't an org-mode issue. The figures where bitmaps and I did not
> have bmp in the image-file-name-extensions variables. Sorry for the
> noise!
Glad you sorted it!
--
Eric S Fraga (GnuPG: 0xC89193D8FFFCF67D)
signature.asc
D
Do'oh! It wasn't an org-mode issue. The figures where bitmaps and I did not
have bmp in the image-file-name-extensions variables. Sorry for the
noise!
Julian M. Burgos writes:
> Thanks Eric. I did read the description, and my link do not have any
> associated text. It is something else. If I
Thanks Eric. I did read the description, and my link do not have any
associated text. It is something else. If I evaluate (print
image-types) I get the following:
(imagemagick png gif tiff jpeg xpm xbm pbm postscript). And if I
evaluate for example (image-type-available-p 'jpeg) I get "t". But
On Thursday, 9 Mar 2017 at 14:25, Julian M. Burgos wrote:
> Dear list,
>
> I cannot get org-mode to display inline images. Instead, when doing M-x
> org-toggle-inline-images I get a "No images to display inline". But if
> I click on the image link, the image appears in a new buffer with no probl
Dear list,
I cannot get org-mode to display inline images. Instead, when doing M-x
org-toggle-inline-images I get a "No images to display inline". But if
I click on the image link, the image appears in a new buffer with no problems.
This happens with a clean emacs instance (emacs -Q), so it is
