Hi Rasmus,
Rasmus writes:
> BTW: are you aware of emacs-async at:
>
> https://github.com/jwiegley/emacs-async
Yes.
> It mainly make sense with time-consuming processes, though. I think
> John is trying to push it to Emacs-core.
Not only with time-consuming processes, but for processes th
Bastien writes:
> Tobias Naehring writes:
>
>> A poor man's solution to allow parallel shell processes would be to replace
>> the
>> code fragment
>>
>> (progn
>>(message "Executing %s" cmd)
>>(shell-command cmd))
>>(error "Abort"
>>
Hi Tobias,
Tobias Naehring writes:
> A poor man's solution to allow parallel shell processes would be to replace
> the
> code fragment
>
> (progn
> (message "Executing %s" cmd)
> (shell-command cmd))
> (error "Abort"
>
> from `org-op
Currently, only one asynchronous shell process can be started inside an org
buffer via
[[shell: ... &]]
The reason is that in `org-open-at-point' only the default shell output buffer
`*Shell Command Output*' is used for `shell-command'.
A poor man's solution to allow parallel shell processes wou
