Hi Nick,
Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com writes:
But this is the second time that I have had to defend keeping the tag
and I hope that the rest of you will sympathise with my reasons for
keeping the tag.
Be reassured: at least I do. Hope we can move forward now.
--
Bastien
Samuel Wales samolog...@gmail.com writes:
The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost
never can read the entire subject header. Often I get to read only
the first word. Tags will make that worse.
I hope the switch from [Orgmode] to [O] will make things easier for you.
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
Couldn't you just drop it?
Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
--
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info
pgpcuBCMMMZGw.pgp
Description: PGP signature
___
Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info writes:
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
Couldn't you just drop it?
Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
No, it's useful to people who filter emails through the subject line.
--
Bastien
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
No, it's useful to people who filter emails through the subject line.
It would be better to teach these people this is not a good practice
rather than polluting the subject lines for everybody…
--
Julien Danjou
❱ http://julien.danjou.info
The thing that is most difficult for me is the fact that I almost
never can read the entire subject header. Often I get to read only
the first word. Tags will make that worse.
I hope the switch from [Orgmode] to [O] will make things easier for you.
Since we now have a single letter [O]
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info writes:
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
Couldn't you just drop it?
Seriously, this [O] is useless and ridiculous.
Not to me.
No, it's useful to people who filter emails
[O] is *much* better than [Orgmode]. Thank you.
Looking forward to [OD] and [OB], if that's what we will use.
___
Emacs-orgmode mailing list
Please use `Reply All' to send replies to the list.
Emacs-orgmode@gnu.org
On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 10:14 AM, Nick Dokos nicholas.do...@hp.com wrote:
Bastien b...@altern.org wrote:
Julien Danjou jul...@danjou.info writes:
On Mon, Feb 28 2011, Bastien wrote:
I changed the [Orgmode] tag to [O].
Couldn't you just drop it?
Seriously, this [O] is
On 28 Feb 2011, at 18:05, Samuel Wales wrote:
[O] is *much* better than [Orgmode]. Thank you.
Looking forward to [OD] and [OB], if that's what we will use.
Plus [OS], for discussions about splitting the mailing list.
Konrad
PS: Don't worry, this is my last post on this topic!
Matthew Sauer improv.philoso...@gmail.com writes:
I think that if it was kept as a single list the use of tags could allow (as
long as people respect the tags) to filter and read only the types of
threads they want to use.
If we split the lists I would tag both with the same tag in my gmail
11 matches
Mail list logo
