[O] Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?)

2011-03-18 Thread Ben
> > > I went that way because it was easier to implement. Though, there is > code somewhere to transpose tables (in Library of Babel, I think). So > you can type list items as columns instead, change the list into > a table, and transpose it. VoilĂ . > > Brilliant! Thank you again Nicolas! -- Ben

[O] Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?)

2011-03-18 Thread Nicolas
Hello, Ben writes: > Oh actually you went the 'line' way -- and not the column. > Considering, I actually think you're right. > I got used to the ReST way (1 item + sub-items = 1 column) but I think your > way seems more natural. I went that way because it was easier to implement. Though, there

Re: [O] Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?)

2011-03-17 Thread feng shu
I wish org-mode can do like this... - Row 1 :exports tabel - 1.1 - 1.2 - 1.3 - Row 2 - 2.1 - 2.2 - 2.3 On Fri, Mar 18, 2011 at 6:18 AM, Ben wrote: >> >> Out of boredom, I've written a draft for it. >> > > > Woohoo! congrats for the way you're getting bored! > Hey thank you Nicolas!

Re: [O] Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?)

2011-03-17 Thread Nick Dokos
Ben wrote: > > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > > > > So here I'm guessing the whole code fits into Babel, right? > It depends on what you mean: you *can* use babel to evaluate the code (C-c C-c on every code block, or similar), thereby loading it into your current emacs, but if you want to use this c

[O] Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?)

2011-03-17 Thread Ben
> > > Out of boredom, I've written a draft for it. > > Woohoo! congrats for the way you're getting bored! Hey thank you Nicolas! > #+begin_src emacs-lisp > So here I'm guessing the whole code fits into Babel, right? All of this will convert > (...) > | Row 1 | 1.1 | 1.2 | 1.3 | > | Row 2 | 2

[O] Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?)

2011-03-17 Thread Nicolas
Hello, Ben writes: > I'm thinking about a potential alternative and I would like to know if > anyone here would know if this can be done with org. > ReStructured Text [2] has a nice feature called list-tables. As you can > guess from the name, you write a list and an instruction to process it an

[O] Re: List-table feature (or a potential quick and easy mullti-lines table in org?)

2011-03-17 Thread Jambunathan K
> What is does it to transform a nested list in a simple table. Just a thought. If someone takes a stab at it, I suggest that they use my experimental staging branch (org-html/org-odt) that implements callbacks for various org entities like paragraphs, outline, lists and tables. Without looki