[O] Re: Odd behavior with numbered list, footnotes, and LaTeX

2011-04-09 Thread John Hendy
On Sat, Apr 9, 2011 at 6:38 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > John Hendy writes: > >> On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >>> Hello, >>> >>> John Hendy writes: >>> Just stumbled across something very odd I can't figure out. Here's a sample: ,- |

[O] Re: Odd behavior with numbered list, footnotes, and LaTeX

2011-04-09 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, John Hendy writes: > On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: >> Hello, >> >> John Hendy writes: >> >>> Just stumbled across something very odd I can't figure out. Here's a sample: >>> ,- >>> | #+OPTIONS:   toc:t TeX:t LaTeX:t H:4 f:t todo:nil num:t tags:nil >>> | #+la

[O] Re: Odd behavior with numbered list, footnotes, and LaTeX

2011-04-06 Thread John Hendy
On Wed, Apr 6, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > John Hendy writes: > >> Just stumbled across something very odd I can't figure out. Here's a sample: >> ,- >> | #+OPTIONS:   toc:t TeX:t LaTeX:t H:4 f:t todo:nil num:t tags:nil >> | #+latex_class: article >> | >> | * Section

[O] Re: Odd behavior with numbered list, footnotes, and LaTeX

2011-04-06 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, John Hendy writes: > Just stumbled across something very odd I can't figure out. Here's a sample: > ,- > | #+OPTIONS: toc:t TeX:t LaTeX:t H:4 f:t todo:nil num:t tags:nil > | #+latex_class: article > | > | * Section > | 1. *A section*: a bunch of text is here and it seems like the >