-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 31/03/11 05:40, Eric Schulte wrote:
> Suvayu Ali writes:
>
>> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:19 -0600
>> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>>
This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch
which introduces new features and run af
Suvayu Ali writes:
> On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:19 -0600
> "Eric Schulte" wrote:
>
>> >
>> > This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch
>> > which introduces new features and run after each patch.
>> >
>>
>> Agreed, in a perfect world...
>>
>> >
>> > So is it only neces
On Wed, 30 Mar 2011 15:42:19 -0600
"Eric Schulte" wrote:
> >
> > This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch
> > which introduces new features and run after each patch.
> >
>
> Agreed, in a perfect world...
>
> >
> > So is it only necessary to add meat to this framework?
Rainer M Krug writes:
> On 30/03/11 16:18, Christian Egli wrote:
>> Rainer M Krug writes:
>>
http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnitTesting
>>>
>>> Am I right in assuming, that all of the possible test frameworks would
>>> require org files and the expected output (tengle, export to ...,
>>> a
Aankhen writes:
> On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 20:43, Manuel Giraud
> wrote:
>> Rainer M Krug writes:
>> [snip]
>>
>>> Please correct me if I am missing something.
>>>
>>> This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch which
>>> introduces new features and run after each patch.
>>
On Wed, Mar 30, 2011 at 20:43, Manuel Giraud
wrote:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
> [snip]
>
>> Please correct me if I am missing something.
>>
>> This suite should actually be updated with effectively each patch which
>> introduces new features and run after each patch.
>
> Which renders this framewor
Rainer M Krug writes:
> But it does not look as if it is used very often... There are not many
> test org files, and I did not se anything which compares the resulting
> exported / tangle file with an expected output?
It could be useful to have this kind of framework for org but I think it
is d
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/03/11 16:18, Christian Egli wrote:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>>> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnitTesting
>>
>> Am I right in assuming, that all of the possible test frameworks would
>> require org files and the expected output (tengle, expor
, March 30, 2011 9:11:23 AM
Subject: [O] Re: Test framework needed
On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> On 30/03/11 15:46, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I was bitten again from an unintende
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/03/11 16:11, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
>> On 30/03/11 15:46, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>>> On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>>
Hi
I was bitten again from an unintended regression i
Rainer M Krug writes:
>> http://www.emacswiki.org/emacs/UnitTesting
>
> Am I right in assuming, that all of the possible test frameworks would
> require org files and the expected output (tengle, export to ...,
> agenda, ...)? In this case, would it make sense to start collecting
> those, as they
On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> On 30/03/11 15:46, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
>> On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>>
>>> Hi
>>>
>>> I was bitten again from an unintended regression in org-mode, and that
>>> the second time in two weeks.
>>>
>>> I am probably not the right person
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 30/03/11 15:46, Eric Abrahamsen wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> I was bitten again from an unintended regression in org-mode, and that
>> the second time in two weeks.
>>
>> I am probably not the right person to sug
On Wed, Mar 30 2011, Rainer M Krug wrote:
> Hi
>
> I was bitten again from an unintended regression in org-mode, and that
> the second time in two weeks.
>
> I am probably not the right person to suggest this, but I think it is
> time to introduce a test framework for org-mode, to ensure that the
14 matches
Mail list logo
