suvayu ali writes:
> Since recently calc code block support was added to babel, why not use
> that to process your table instead of table formulae? Wouldn't you
> expect it would be easier to deal with NaN and its likes directly with
> calc source compared to formulae?
I'm going to try that. I j
Hi Thorsten,
Disclaimer: I haven't tried any of what I am proposing below. Its just
a thought that came to me while reading your post.
On Sun, Mar 6, 2011 at 2:44 PM, Thorsten
wrote:
> But even if nil would work, my basic question remains: if I have for
> example a dynamic report were one code-b
Rainer M Krug writes:
> On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Thorsten
> wrote:
>> Bastien writes:
>>
>>> Hi Thorsten,
>>>
>>> Thorsten writes:
>>>
Ok, trial and error suggests that missing values in numeric columns can
be represented as 0 in formulas, in string columns as "". Is there
>>
On Sat, Mar 5, 2011 at 11:55 AM, Thorsten
wrote:
> Bastien writes:
>
>> Hi Thorsten,
>>
>> Thorsten writes:
>>
>>> Ok, trial and error suggests that missing values in numeric columns can
>>> be represented as 0 in formulas, in string columns as "". Is there
>>> something like NaN in calc/org-tab
Bastien writes:
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> Thorsten writes:
>
>> Ok, trial and error suggests that missing values in numeric columns can
>> be represented as 0 in formulas, in string columns as "". Is there
>> something like NaN in calc/org-table?
>
> I don't know what is NaN. Can you give an example
