Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-20 Thread Eric S Fraga
On Friday, 17 Apr 2015 at 22:20, Peter Davis wrote: > Thanks. I've had some success with these headers: [...] > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\headsep}{0pt} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\topskip}{0pt} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\topmargin}{0pt} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\topsep}{-10pt} [...]

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-18 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2015-04-18, at 19:27, John Hendy wrote: > On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: >> >> On 2015-04-17, at 20:13, John Hendy wrote: >> >>> Everything you'll do in Org will simply involve passing the right >>> parameters to LaTeX via Org. In other words, you should start by >

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-18 Thread Peter Davis
On 4/18/15 1:27 PM, John Hendy wrote: On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: On 2015-04-17, at 20:13, John Hendy wrote: Everything you'll do in Org will simply involve passing the right parameters to LaTeX via Org. In other words, you should start by Personally, I prefer

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-18 Thread John Hendy
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 7:18 PM, Marcin Borkowski wrote: > > On 2015-04-17, at 20:13, John Hendy wrote: > >> Everything you'll do in Org will simply involve passing the right >> parameters to LaTeX via Org. In other words, you should start by > > Personally, I prefer configuring on the LaTeX side

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-18 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2015-04-18, at 04:20, Peter Davis wrote: > Thanks. I've had some success with these headers: > > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\parskip}{0pt} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\parsep}{6pt} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\headsep}{0pt} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\topskip}{0pt} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setl

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-17 Thread Peter Davis
Thanks. I've had some success with these headers: #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\parskip}{0pt} #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\parsep}{6pt} #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\headsep}{0pt} #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\topskip}{0pt} #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\topmargin}{0pt} #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlength{\topsep}

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-17 Thread Marcin Borkowski
On 2015-04-17, at 20:13, John Hendy wrote: > Everything you'll do in Org will simply involve passing the right > parameters to LaTeX via Org. In other words, you should start by Personally, I prefer configuring on the LaTeX side, but this is because I find it much easier. > finding out how to

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-17 Thread John Hendy
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 2:13 PM, Peter Davis wrote: > > On 4/17/15 2:13 PM, John Hendy wrote: >> >> Definitely look at paralist and enumitem for tweaking spacing as a >> starting point. Hope that helps. John > > Thanks, John. This > > #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{enumitem} > #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlis

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-17 Thread Peter Davis
On 4/17/15 2:13 PM, John Hendy wrote: Definitely look at paralist and enumitem for tweaking spacing as a starting point. Hope that helps. John Thanks, John. This #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{enumitem} #+LATEX_HEADER: \setlist{nolistsep} produced nice tight lists, though there is still a lot o

Re: [O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-17 Thread John Hendy
On Fri, Apr 17, 2015 at 12:28 PM, Peter Davis wrote: > Hi > > I'm trying to get a single .org file I can use to general PDF, HTML or even > (gasp!) Word format versions of my resume. The problem I'm having now is > that the PDF is 7 pages, compared with the 4 pages I get from my directly > editing

[O] Resume: Squeezing lines tighter in LaTeX output?

2015-04-17 Thread Peter Davis
Hi I'm trying to get a single .org file I can use to general PDF, HTML or even (gasp!) Word format versions of my resume. The problem I'm having now is that the PDF is 7 pages, compared with the 4 pages I get from my directly editing LaTeX file. One big difference is that individual jobs, tit