Re: [O] Semantics of 'C-c -' and massively-indented lists

2011-05-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Huy writes: > Whenever possible, the converted lines should preserve their relative > levels with their parent. In the above example, we have 2 subtrees > that should be preserved separately. > Of course, we can't keep all 5 items with levels relative to each > other, otherwise we'd get the nonse

Re: [O] Semantics of 'C-c -' and massively-indented lists

2011-05-28 Thread Huy
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 07:09:06AM -0700, Huy wrote: > On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:29:07PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > > Fixed. > > > > Please report back if something is still wrong. Thank you. > > Perfect behavior! Exactly what I was expecting. > > The only problem is a typo 'skip-blank' in

Re: [O] Semantics of 'C-c -' and massively-indented lists

2011-05-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Huy writes: > The only problem is a typo 'skip-blank' instead of 'skip-blanks' Oops. Fixed that too. Regards, -- Nicolas Goaziou

Re: [O] Semantics of 'C-c -' and massively-indented lists

2011-05-28 Thread Huy
On Sat, May 28, 2011 at 02:29:07PM +0200, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Huy writes: > > > The effects of converting from headline to list with 'C-c -' and back > > to 'C-c *' don't behave as I'd expect. The indentation levels seem all > > wrong, no matter how you look at it. > > I have pu

Re: [O] Semantics of 'C-c -' and massively-indented lists

2011-05-28 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Huy writes: > The effects of converting from headline to list with 'C-c -' and back > to 'C-c *' don't behave as I'd expect. The indentation levels seem all > wrong, no matter how you look at it. I have pushed a patch that should go in the right direction. See below. > What I would like

[O] Semantics of 'C-c -' and massively-indented lists

2011-05-27 Thread Huy
Hello, I'm a beginner, so please let me know if I'm completely off the mark. The effects of converting from headline to list with 'C-c -' and back to 'C-c *' don't behave as I'd expect. The indentation levels seem all wrong, no matter how you look at it. My Setup I'm using org 7.5 wit