On 11/12/2012 09:31 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Simon Thumsimon.t...@gmx.de writes:
I see, it just seemed to me that org-contacts uses it for (seemingly)
good reasons and there is no replacement or deprecation. Is there
missing consensus on this syntax?
I don't think so. AFAIU this syntax
Simon Thum simon.t...@gmx.de writes:
Sure. I'd appreciate if the new icalendar exporter would handle these
entries (in particular org-contacts ones) - I didn't yet get it to
export agendas. Is it possible to do that?
There's support for it (see `org-e-icalendar-include-sexps'). Internally
it
Simon Thum simon.t...@gmx.de writes:
I see, it just seemed to me that org-contacts uses it for (seemingly)
good reasons and there is no replacement or deprecation. Is there
missing consensus on this syntax?
I don't think so. AFAIU this syntax was created to include diary entries
without the
Hello,
Simon Thum simon.t...@gmx.de writes:
To prevent further breakage, I am attaching a doc fix. I hope it is
useable?
This is already documented in section 10.3.1 (Calendar/Diary
integration) of the manual. I don't think it's useful to drop another
note there.
Thanks for your patch,
On 11/10/2012 11:31 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Simon Thumsimon.t...@gmx.de writes:
To prevent further breakage, I am attaching a doc fix. I hope it is
useable?
This is already documented in section 10.3.1 (Calendar/Diary
integration) of the manual. I don't think it's useful to drop
Simon Thum simon.t...@gmx.de writes:
I know that, but I deemed it useful to document it as a related but
separate mechanism on its own merit. Perhaps there could be a link to
10.3.1 to make it clear that the notations differ in important ways?
Since %%(...) syntax isn't a timestamp /per se/,
On 11/10/2012 05:24 PM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Simon Thumsimon.t...@gmx.de writes:
I know that, but I deemed it useful to document it as a related but
separate mechanism on its own merit. Perhaps there could be a link to
10.3.1 to make it clear that the notations differ in important ways?
Sorry, I was being dumb. All fine.
To prevent further breakage, I am attaching a doc fix. I hope it is useable?
Cheers,
Simon
On 11/06/2012 11:21 PM, Simon Thum wrote:
Dear all,
I have a sexp entry that somehow works less good now. It's
** 11:00 Monthly PTB Telco
%%(org-float t 2 3)
(some
Dear all,
I have a sexp entry that somehow works less good now. It's
** 11:00 Monthly PTB Telco
%%(org-float t 2 3)
(some more stuff)
The agenda reads SEXP entry returned empty string, whereas previously
I got the headline.
Putting something behind the sexp get me that, but the time is
