As an infrequent committer to org-mode, I wonder if the maint branch is
more pain than gain.
I've read through the mails arguing for its conception, and the benefits
just don't appear to be resultant.
Add to that - infrequent committer's who commit via the list generally
know nothing about the
Hi Martyn
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com writes:
As an infrequent committer to org-mode, I wonder if the maint branch is
more pain than gain.
I'm still in the process of fixing things.
After I'm done, I will suggest a new workflow.
Thanks,
--
Bastien
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com writes:
As an infrequent committer to org-mode, I wonder if the maint branch is
more pain than gain.
I've read through the mails arguing for its conception, and the benefits
just don't appear to be resultant.
It seemed to work well until Bastien made a
Hi Achim,
Achim Gratz strom...@nexgo.de writes:
It seemed to work well until Bastien made a mistake because the release
script wasn't properly adapted and digged the hole deeper while trying
to fix it (too) quickly. Maint is good again, master still needs a few
more touches.
This should be
Hi Martyn,
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com writes:
As an infrequent committer to org-mode, I wonder if the maint branch is
more pain than gain.
It is a pain when too many things should happen on it.
IMO It is a gain when we dedicate it to releases only.
No pain should come out of
Bastien b...@altern.org writes:
Hi Bastien, Achim
Hi Martyn,
Martyn Jago martyn.j...@btinternet.com writes:
As an infrequent committer to org-mode, I wonder if the maint branch is
more pain than gain.
It is a pain when too many things should happen on it.
IMO It is a gain when we
