Hello,
Karl Voit writes:
> Results at the end of this posting.
Thank you.
I assume you have around 17 agenda files, use a single day view and have
much more SCHEDULED than DEADLINE? Is it right?
> I may take some time to come up with a minimum config and my agenda
> files.
I suggest to use
Karl Voit writes:
>> It might be helpful if you posted a censored version of your large Org
>> files somewhere. There's a function by Nicolas that replaces all the
>> characters with "x", and there's also a function that replaces words
>> with random words of the same length (that one takes a wh
* Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> I just learned about elp-instrument-package. What prefixes are of interest to
>> you?
>
> "org-" prefix. The nice thing about `elp-instrument-package' is that is
> reports the number of times a function is called.
Results at the end of this posti
Hi Adam,
* Adam Porter wrote:
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> With a fairly modified configuration (like mine on [0]) and a large
>> set of long Org-mode files I can't publish, it is hard to do
>> analysis here. So I can offer to report any performance annoyances
>> and anything you need to execute (re
Karl Voit writes:
> I just learned about elp-instrument-package. What prefixes are of interest to
> you?
"org-" prefix. The nice thing about `elp-instrument-package' is that is
reports the number of times a function is called.
> un-compiled agenda profiler-report:
Thank you. However, there is
Karl Voit writes:
> With a fairly modified configuration (like mine on [0]) and a large
> set of long Org-mode files I can't publish, it is hard to do
> analysis here. So I can offer to report any performance annoyances
> and anything you need to execute (report) on my side.
It might be helpful
Hi Nicolas,
* Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
>
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> First: I've occasionally mentioned all kinds of performance issues
>> over the last years.
btw, working within my Memacs agenda [1] with a bit under a million
lines of Org-mode is the worst case scenario from my point of view
so fa
Hello,
Karl Voit writes:
> First: I've occasionally mentioned all kinds of performance issues
> over the last years.
That's important indeed. But performance issues needs a proper profiling
report to be useful. The type of data being processed (i.e., something
that would be unusual, like 9k clo
* Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
> Hello,
Hi Nicolas,
> Karl Voit writes:
>
>> My daily agenda takes twenty seconds, my weekly approximately a
>> minute and generating a monthly agenda is something I can only do
>> when I plan to leave the computer for a longer break.
>>
>> Org-mode does not scale well
Hello,
Karl Voit writes:
> My daily agenda takes twenty seconds, my weekly approximately a
> minute and generating a monthly agenda is something I can only do
> when I plan to leave the computer for a longer break.
>
> Org-mode does not scale well, I'm afraid.
>
> Repeatedly going through all ag
Hello,
John Kitchin writes:
> I can think of two possibilities for a future approach (besides a deep dive
> on profiling the current elisp to improve the speed there). They both
> involve some substantial coding though, and would probably add
> dependencies. I am curious what anyone things about
11 matches
Mail list logo
