Re: [O] Small bug? org-narrow-to-subtree and open file link

2015-03-08 Thread Igor Sosa Mayor
James K. Lin writes: > By default, Org mode does not work well with indirect buffers. You could get > around this by rolling your own version of functions on your own to ignore > the base buffer. This is no small feat because the link navigation commands > are nested. I understand... thanks for

Re: [O] Small bug? org-narrow-to-subtree and open file link

2015-03-06 Thread James K . Lin
Igor Sosa Mayor gmail.com> writes: > > James K. Lin yahoo.com> writes: > > > org-narrow-to-subtree creates a subtree buffer. Your org-return call within > > that new subtree buffer command operates on the base buffer. Many of Org's > > link navigation commands operate this way because they use

Re: [O] Small bug? org-narrow-to-subtree and open file link

2015-03-06 Thread Igor Sosa Mayor
James K. Lin writes: > org-narrow-to-subtree creates a subtree buffer. Your org-return call within > that new subtree buffer command operates on the base buffer. Many of Org's > link navigation commands operate this way because they use the base buffer > as their context. thanks for your answer.

Re: [O] Small bug? org-narrow-to-subtree and open file link

2015-03-06 Thread James K . Lin
Igor Sosa Mayor gmail.com> writes: > > Hi, > > maybe this is a small bug or something wrong in my config... > > But: if I use org-narrow-to-subtree and then use org-return to open a > file link the narrowed function get lost and I get the whole buffer > again. This happens at least if I get a

[O] Small bug? org-narrow-to-subtree and open file link

2015-03-06 Thread Igor Sosa Mayor
Hi, maybe this is a small bug or something wrong in my config... But: if I use org-narrow-to-subtree and then use org-return to open a file link the narrowed function get lost and I get the whole buffer again. This happens at least if I get a question because the file is too big and I have to dec