Hello,
Wagemans, Peter peter.wagem...@kpn.com writes:
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Also, you have to admit that Org is a bit more complex than Text mode
(or Fundamental mode), and may have different requirements.
It sure is a great tool, with a lot of useful functionality. But the
new paragraph
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Also, you have to admit that Org is a bit more complex than Text mode
(or Fundamental mode), and may have different requirements.
It sure is a great tool, with a lot of useful functionality. But the
new paragraph fill breaks my old workflows, so I am trying to find a
Hello Peter,
On Mon, May 27, 2013 at 01:03:41PM +0200, Wagemans, Peter wrote:
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Also, you have to admit that Org is a bit more complex than Text mode
(or Fundamental mode), and may have different requirements.
It sure is a great tool, with a lot of useful
Hello,
Wagemans, Peter peter.wagem...@kpn.com writes:
In org 7.8.11 with emacs 24.2 fill-paragraph used to recognize
paragraph fill prefixes as usual for mail citations. This seems to be
no longer the case (which I noticed first with org 7.9.3 with emacs
24.3). Apparently this has been
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
You can wrap your mail citation within a Verse block (or an example
block).
That appears to inhibit paragraph filling. The desired and previously
existing functionality is paragraph filling that preserves the
paragraph citation prefix.
Also, I often compose complete
Wagemans, Peter peter.wagem...@kpn.com writes:
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
You can wrap your mail citation within a Verse block (or an example
block).
That appears to inhibit paragraph filling. The desired and previously
existing functionality is paragraph filling that preserves the
paragraph
On 5/24/13, Wagemans, Peter peter.wagem...@kpn.com wrote:
In org 7.8.11 with emacs 24.2 fill-paragraph used to recognize
paragraph fill prefixes as usual for mail citations. This seems to be
no longer the case (which I noticed first with org 7.9.3 with emacs
24.3). Apparently this has been
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Then try editing your text in a block like:
#+BEGIN_SRC message
...
#+END_SRC
Or with fundamental or text mode. Possible but more cumbersome. Normal
text paragraph fill used to just work.
I wouldn't call it a regression since this behaviour never was
Wagemans, Peter peter.wagem...@kpn.com writes:
Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Then try editing your text in a block like:
#+BEGIN_SRC message
...
#+END_SRC
Or with fundamental or text mode. Possible but more cumbersome. Normal
text paragraph fill used to just work.
No, it didn't just
