Hello,
Nick Dokos writes:
> I looked at the diff between html files produced with and without the $\big/$
> addition.
> The one without does not include any of the mathjax configuration code at
> all. Is that
> code included conditionally perhaps when a latex construct is
Nick Dokos writes:
> Lawrence Bottorff writes:
>
>> ... I use
>>
>> # this makes MathJax work
>> #+OPTIONS: tex:t
>>
>> I just now found this caption weirdness because I started a new .org
>> file with no latex symbol markup besides in the caption. Quite
>>
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> ... I use
>
> # this makes MathJax work
> #+OPTIONS: tex:t
>
> I just now found this caption weirdness because I started a new .org
> file with no latex symbol markup besides in the caption. Quite
> bizarre that when my file sees other latex
#+options: tex:dvipng is not good because it turns all your latex symbol
markup into images, which are inserted into the web page as images, i.e.,
it's not doing MathJax. Also bad because they don't really fit the text
lines, either. I use
# this makes MathJax work
#+OPTIONS: tex:t
I just now
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
>
> Lawrence Bottorff writes:
>
>> Consider this markup:
>>
>>
>> * MATHEMATICS AUXILIARY
>>
>> ** deriving sines and cosines
>>
>> #+caption: Right triangle with two $\pi\big/4$ angles.
>>
Hello,
Lawrence Bottorff writes:
> Consider this markup:
>
>
> * MATHEMATICS AUXILIARY
>
> ** deriving sines and cosines
>
> #+caption: Right triangle with two $\pi\big/4$ angles.
> [[file:images/45-45-triangle.png]]
>
> $\big/$
>
>
> If I remove the
Consider this markup:
* MATHEMATICS AUXILIARY
** deriving sines and cosines
#+caption: Right triangle with two $\pi\big/4$ angles.
[[file:images/45-45-triangle.png]]
$\big/$
If I remove the second $\big/$, the first latex, $\pi\big/4$, in the
caption will not