This patch has now been accepted - I believe the performance hit will be minor.
I would like to know if this is not the case...
- Carsten
On Sep 29, 2011, at 5:48 PM, Andreas Amann wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:43:27 +0200, Michael Brand
michael.ch.br...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29,
Hi list,
I encounter the following surprising situation when using Org Agenda.
Suppose you have an agenda file which looks like this:
test.org --
* bar
2011-09-29 Thu 12:00
2011-09-30 Fri 13:00
* foo
2011-09-29 Thu 15:00
2011-09-29 Thu 16:00
M-x
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:25, Daniel Bausch danielbau...@gmx.de wrote:
It's not a bug, it's a feature (although I don't know what it's for -- maybe
speed). However, there is a customizable option to switch it off:
org-agenda-skip-additional-timestamps-same-entry
Interesting. git blame and a
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:43:27 +0200, Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com
wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:25, Daniel Bausch danielbau...@gmx.de wrote:
It's not a bug, it's a feature (although I don't know what it's for -- maybe
speed). However, there is a customizable option to switch
Hi Andreas,
Andreas Amann wrote:
On Thu, 29 Sep 2011 15:43:27 +0200, Michael Brand
michael.ch.br...@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Sep 29, 2011 at 15:25, Daniel Bausch danielbau...@gmx.de wrote:
It's not a bug, it's a feature (although I don't know what it's for --
maybe
speed). However,
