Re: [O] TODO items as part of an itemized list?

2012-03-26 Thread Bastien
Hi Richard and Nick, Nick Dokos writes: > Richard Stanton wrote: > > >> Just one remaining problem, however. The exporter inserts a hard >> line-break, "\\" after the first line of each of these \item entries. This >> is fine when there is additional text for that item, but if the TODO item >>

Re: [O] TODO items as part of an itemized list?

2012-03-21 Thread Nick Dokos
Richard Stanton wrote: > Just one remaining problem, however. The exporter inserts a hard > line-break, "\\" after the first line of each of these \item entries. This > is fine when there is additional text for that item, but if the TODO item > is just one line, this results in unwanted extra wh

Re: [O] TODO items as part of an itemized list?

2012-03-21 Thread Richard Stanton
Makes sense. I realize I can achieve almost all of what I want by making my TODO items, say, level three headers, "***", then not including \subsubsection in my latex_class definition. Now each TODO item is printed in LaTeX as a separate \item in an itemize list, just as I wanted. Just one remaini

Re: [O] TODO items as part of an itemized list?

2012-03-20 Thread Bastien
Hi Richard, Richard Stanton writes: > To save space in LaTeX exports and also to stop my TODO items being > numbered, I'd like to have TODO items as part of a list, e.g., > > - TODO Item 1 > - TODO Item 2 > > However, while this prints OK, these entries are ignored by org-mode when > I ask it to

[O] TODO items as part of an itemized list?

2012-03-20 Thread Richard Stanton
To save space in LaTeX exports and also to stop my TODO items being numbered, I'd like to have TODO items as part of a list, e.g., - TODO Item 1 - TODO Item 2 However, while this prints OK, these entries are ignored by org-mode when I ask it to create a TODO list. Is there any way to do what I wa