Thanks for your reply. I now understand and I also agree it is a good
solution.
Best,
Ruy
On Nov 15, 2017 19:54, "Nicolas Goaziou" wrote:
> Ruy Exel writes:
>
> > Thanks very much. Just out of curiosity I'd be interested in
> understanding
> > how did you do it. My (non expert) impression i
Ruy Exel writes:
> Thanks very much. Just out of curiosity I'd be interested in understanding
> how did you do it. My (non expert) impression is that using properties to
> override column formulas isn't a good idea.
The property is here to prevent evaluation of a column formula on
a given fiel
Ruy Exel writes:
> Hi Nicolas,
>
> Thanks very much. Just out of curiosity I'd be interested in understanding
> how did you do it. My (non
> expert) impression is that using properties to override column formulas isn't
> a good idea. It seems to
> me it would be more natural to apply cell fo
Hi Nicolas,
Thanks very much. Just out of curiosity I'd be interested in understanding
how did you do it. My (non expert) impression is that using properties to
override column formulas isn't a good idea. It seems to me it would be
more natural to apply cell formulas AFTER all column formulas w
Hello,
Ruy Exel writes:
> The following is very simple org-mode spreadsheet in which the cells in the
> second column show the triple of the corresponding cell in the first column
> due to the "column formula" in its TBLFM row $2=3*$1;N. However the third
> row (actually row @4) is an exception
This bug report is motivated by a question I asked at
https://emacs.stackexchange.com/questions/36855/table-refuses-to-forget-cell-formula-which-once-overrode-a-column-formula
and all of the necessary information can probably be obtained from there.
Nevertheless let me repeat it here:
-
