Hi Bastien
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
It is worth a small compatibility change: For a range with only empty
fields it is now possible and necessary to choose different behaviors
of vmean by adding the format specifiers E and/or N.
I'll add this in the release
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
But in the release notes I would generally, not particularly because
of the above, write:
If empty fields are of interest it is recommended to reread the
section 3.5.2 Formula syntax for Calc of the manual because the
description
Hi Bastien
On Sun, Apr 14, 2013 at 12:11 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
PS: you can use .patch as the extension for the patches,
Emacs reads them using diff-mode and our .gitignore will
DTRT here.
Yes, but I do this hack of .patch.txt as a workaround to get the right
email Content-Type:
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
Yes, but I do this hack of .patch.txt as a workaround to get the right
email Content-Type: text/plain when attaching with the web interface
of Google Gmail. There .patch or .diff results in Content-Type:
application/octet-stream which has to be
Hi Bastien
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 7:06 PM, Bastien b...@gnu.org wrote:
Maybe you could add a footnote in the manual for this?
I plan to update some paragraphs of org.texi regarding empty fields
during the next days.
Michael
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com wrote:
You can turn on formula debugging with C-c { and then you'd
see that in Pancho's case, the list is () i.e. a list containing the
empty string - a list of length 1. That might qualify as a bug (or not)
This issue is part of some
Hi Gunnar
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 1:57 AM, Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
#+tblfm: @2$8..@5$8='(length
'($3..$7))::@6$2=vmean($3..$7);%.2f::@6$3..@6$7='(length
'(@2..@5))::@6$8=vmean(@2..@5);%.2f
I would use
#+TBLFM: $8 = vlen($3..$7) :: @$2 = vmean($3..$7); E %.2f ::
@$3..@$7 =
Nick Dokos dijo [Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 11:31:14PM -0400]:
You can turn on formula debugging with C-c { and then you'd
see that in Pancho's case, the list is () i.e. a list containing the
empty string - a list of length 1. That might qualify as a bug (or not) but
you can easily work around
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 10:55 AM, Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
Try this:
#+CAPTION: Attendances for April
|-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
| Account | Name | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 10 | Total |
Michael Brand dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:40:06PM +0200]:
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:31 AM, Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com wrote:
You can turn on formula debugging with C-c { and then you'd
see that in Pancho's case, the list is () i.e. a list containing the
empty string - a list of length 1.
(Quoting in full to preserve mail readability without resorting to too
much context)
#+CAPTION: Attendances for April
|-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
| Account | Name | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 10 | Total |
On Tue, Apr 9, 2013 at 5:10 PM, Nick Dokos ndo...@gmail.com wrote:
@r$c- '(length (delq '(0)))
$1- '(length (delq '(0)))
Result: 1
Check the formula again: you seem to have captured the 0 from the last
column, instead of stopping at the penultimate column. The range should
be $3..$ or
Trying to adapt your workaround with delq to '(0) lets me give up,
also after reading the docstring of delq. Hope you or so can help.
How could I miss the here not so obvious difference between eq and equal:
(delete 0 [...]) works of course.
Michael
Ah, OK - I guess Gunnar will not be able to avoid an upgrade to something
more recent.
And yes, the eq/equal subtleties strike once again:
(eq )
t
(eq 0 0)
nil
(equal 0 0)
t
Nick Dokos dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 12:03:33PM -0400]:
Ah, OK - I guess Gunnar will not be able to avoid an upgrade to something
more recent.
And yes, the eq/equal subtleties strike once again:
(eq )
t
(eq 0 0)
nil
(equal 0 0)
t
Yay - Thanks to you all :-) Yes, it finally works
Hi Michael,
Michael Brand michael.ch.br...@gmail.com writes:
This issue is part of some old bugs that I discovered end of 2012. It
seems like my patch from then
http://orgmode.org/w/org-mode.git?p=org-mode.git;a=commitdiff;h=764315
resolved it only partially and I missed the case of a range
Hi,
As mostly everything for my class work is handled through org-mode, I
am trying to use it also for tracking attendance. And it almost works
(given my quite-probably-wrong way to solve it) — Can you help me
pinpoint what am I doing wrong?
In case it's not obvious, I'm a complete Lisp newbie.
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
#+CAPTION: Attendances for April
|-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
| Account | Name | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 10 | Total |
|-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
|1234 |
Suvayu Ali dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:25:19AM +0200]:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
#+CAPTION: Attendances for April
|-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
| Account | Name | 1 | 3 | 5 | 8 | 10 | Total |
On Mon, Apr 8, 2013 at 10:21 PM, Gunnar Wolf gw...@gwolf.org wrote:
Suvayu Ali dijo [Tue, Apr 09, 2013 at 02:25:19AM +0200]:
On Mon, Apr 08, 2013 at 06:57:53PM -0500, Gunnar Wolf wrote:
#+CAPTION: Attendances for April
|-+---+---+---+---+---++---|
|
...the $3 seemed better than $ though so I kept it)
Bah, humbug: I pasted the $ version, instead of the $3 version.
21 matches
Mail list logo
