Kyle Meyer writes:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> it seems that tangling from an indirect buffer does not work. Is this by
>> design or a bug?
>
> I don't think that's by design.
>
>> Would it be possible to make this possible?
>
> Does the below patch work for you? If so, I can test it
Indirect buffers are of immense help but I had the same issue.
Can confirm that the hack referring to spec instead to the
buffer-file-name and getting the buffer-base-buffer respectively, does
the trick.
Great!
On 2015-09-04 Fri 17:49, Kyle Meyer wrote:
> Rainer M Krug writes:
>
>> Hi
>>
>> it
Rainer M Krug writes:
> Hi
>
> it seems that tangling from an indirect buffer does not work. Is this by
> design or a bug?
I don't think that's by design.
> Would it be possible to make this possible?
Does the below patch work for you? If so, I can test it more thoroughly
and send a proper pa
Hi
it seems that tangling from an indirect buffer does not work. Is this by
design or a bug?
Would it be possible to make this possible? I am working a lot in
indirect buffers (one subfolder R packages, another analysis of data, a
third one results) and would very much like to tangle from them in
