Re: [O] Testing master branch

fwiw i use make oldorg from the shell and restart emacs. never trusted loading from emacs, but i guess it works. the interesting thing is that restarting emacs is necessary as keybindings immediately change. odd that all i did was run something from shell, and didn't afaik do anything inside

Re: [O] Testing master branch

Marco Wahl writes: > Bernt Hansen writes: > >> Can I do make uncompiled instead and skip the restart? >> >> What do you recommend? > > I always rebuild (with "make" or "make test") followed by org-reload > (C-c C-x !). > > Possibly the rebuild can be

Re: [O] Testing master branch

Achim Gratz writes: > Bernt Hansen writes: >> I intend to update and track the master branch git repo changes daily in >> order to identify problems as early as possible. >> >> Does it matter if I compile or not for this? >> >> Normally I do: >> >> git pull >> make >>

Re: [O] Testing master branch

Bernt Hansen writes: > Hi, > > I intend to update and track the master branch git repo changes daily in > order to identify problems as early as possible. > > Does it matter if I compile or not for this? > > Normally I do: > > git pull > make > and restart emacs

Re: [O] Testing master branch

Bernt Hansen writes: > I intend to update and track the master branch git repo changes daily in > order to identify problems as early as possible. > > Does it matter if I compile or not for this? > > Normally I do: > > git pull > make > and restart emacs every morning > > Can I do make

[O] Testing master branch

Hi, I intend to update and track the master branch git repo changes daily in order to identify problems as early as possible. Does it matter if I compile or not for this? Normally I do: git pull make and restart emacs every morning Can I do make uncompiled instead and skip the