>> Which CEDET features would we want to use from core?
>
> For one, I'd like to see more major modes come with support for Semantic
> right in the major mode's own definition (rather than have it part of
> CEDET). E.g. for Elisp mode, CC-mode, ...
>
> The idea is to get to the point where Semanti
On 02/12/2017 11:00 AM, Dmitry Gutov wrote:
On 12.02.2017 05:33, Stefan Monnier wrote:
I don't have anything against supporting Semantic more widely, but we
should understand that it isn't something all users want. And the
"Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based
bac
>> "Semantic is too slow for C++" complaint (e.g. compared to Clang-based
>> background process solutions) is unlikely to go away.
> While I haven't had time to work on CEDET lately, I'd be happy to discuss
> specific performance issues and share ideas on how to improve them,
> presumably after the
On 12.02.2017 05:33, Stefan Monnier wrote:
We don't have enough infrastructure support in general for "advanced"
editing functionality such as type/scope-aware completion. So we have
various add-on thingies (like company-mode, cedet, and auto-complete)
which provide such support for specific mo
SM> For one, I'd like to see more major modes come with support for Semantic
SM> right in the major mode's own definition (rather than have it part of
SM> CEDET). E.g. for Elisp mode, CC-mode, ...
SM> The idea is to get to the point where Semantic support is just another
SM> thing that a major mode
> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes:
SM> For one, I'd like to see more major modes come with support for Semantic
SM> right in the major mode's own definition (rather than have it part of
SM> CEDET). E.g. for Elisp mode, CC-mode, ...
SM> The idea is to get to the point where Semantic support is
SM> 2- We wanted to integrate it more tightly with Emacs (not in terms of
SM> bug-tracking and releasing schedule, but in terms of making it
SM> possible for generic Emacs code to use some of CEDET, and to
SM> encourage more major modes and other features to use CEDET).
> Can you clarify what the p
> "SM" == Stefan Monnier writes:
SM> 2- We wanted to integrate it more tightly with Emacs (not in terms of
SM>bug-tracking and releasing schedule, but in terms of making it
SM>possible for generic Emacs code to use some of CEDET, and to
SM>encourage more major modes and other feat