Re: [O] Versioning of worg content

Bastien writes: > No. Worg needs love. And yes, we could tag Worg's repository > with Org-mode versions, the same as we would do with documentation. If you are talking about the Git repository behind Worg, then: a) Yes, we could give that repository version tags. b) No, we shouldn't do that

Re: [O] Versioning of worg content

Hi Stefan, "Stefan-W. Hahn" writes: > is their a defined proceeding of how to cope with incompatible changes of > org-mode in the examples at orgmode.org/worg? No. Worg needs love. And yes, we could tag Worg's repository with Org-mode versions, the same as we would do

[O] Versioning of worg content

Hello, is their a defined proceeding of how to cope with incompatible changes of org-mode in the examples at orgmode.org/worg? Just stumbled about examples for org-agenda where org-agenda-ndays is still used when I already using org 9.1 where the alias is removed. With kind regards Stefan --