Re: [O] babel awk with table input: Code block produced no output.

2012-08-05 Thread Greg Minshall
Tom, > :results output sounds right for awk as a report formatter. I'm > wondering if there is a need for :results value with awk? yes, i agree. i didn't get far enough into the code to see where the "value" result was coming from. cheers, Greg

Re: [O] babel awk with table input: Code block produced no output.

2012-08-05 Thread Thomas S. Dye
Hi Greg, :results output sounds right for awk as a report formatter. I'm wondering if there is a need for :results value with awk? All the best, Tom Greg Minshall writes: > hi. i did a bit of poking around. here are my findings, but i'm not > conversant enough with the semantics and interco

Re: [O] babel awk with table input: Code block produced no output.

2012-08-05 Thread Greg Minshall
hi. i did a bit of poking around. here are my findings, but i'm not conversant enough with the semantics and interconnectivity of org-mode to know what should be done. to summarize: if a Babel awk script returns something that starts out with a left paren ("("), i get "Code block returned no val

Re: [O] babel awk with table input: Code block produced no output.

2012-08-02 Thread Sebastien Vauban
Hi Greg, Greg Minshall wrote: > hi. it appears that a left or right paren in an entry in a table makes > awk not execute. here's an example (change ":stdin fails" to ":stdin > works" to see it work). cheers, Greg > > #+tblname: fails > | proto | no c code |

[O] babel awk with table input: Code block produced no output.

2012-08-02 Thread Greg Minshall
hi. it appears that a left or right paren in an entry in a table makes awk not execute. here's an example (change ":stdin fails" to ":stdin works" to see it work). cheers, Greg #+tblname: fails | proto | no c code || | pscl | c code, just fin