Re: [O] behavior of org-image-actual-size with units in attr_* :width

2014-10-03 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, John Kitchin writes: > Nicolas Goaziou writes: > > is it the case that ATTR_HTML width attributes are only in pixels? No, but it's the only export back-end dedicated to on-screen display. So, in-buffer width is probably only meaningful there. > If so, that is certainly an easier modif

Re: [O] behavior of org-image-actual-size with units in attr_* :width

2014-10-01 Thread John Kitchin
Nicolas Goaziou writes: is it the case that ATTR_HTML width attributes are only in pixels? If so, that is certainly an easier modification to make, and would solve my problem (we almost exclusively use attr_latex for that export). Your comment inspired me to solve it this way: #+attr_latex: :wi

Re: [O] behavior of org-image-actual-size with units in attr_* :width

2014-10-01 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, John Kitchin writes: > I have set this in my init file > > (setq org-image-actual-width '(600)) > > It works great, unless I use: > #+attr_latex: :width 4in > > This makes my images 4 inches wide in LaTeX, but it sets my images to > approximately 4 pixels wide! > > I feel like it is worth

[O] behavior of org-image-actual-size with units in attr_* :width

2014-09-30 Thread John Kitchin
I have set this in my init file (setq org-image-actual-width '(600)) It works great, unless I use: #+attr_latex: :width 4in This makes my images 4 inches wide in LaTeX, but it sets my images to approximately 4 pixels wide! I feel like it is worth modifying the regexp that gets the width to catc