Nicolas Floquet writes:
> Le jeudi 16 mai 2019 à 17:16 +0200, Nicolas Floquet a écrit :
>> The problem is not solved on emacs 26.2.
>
> I have just humbly made a little commit wich is not the best solution,
> take in consideration that I am not a programmer… I can not currently
> do better ! :-)
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
I asked
> > Is the WebDAV server code free software? Can you talk to such a
>
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> Hello,
Hi,
>> Is the WebDAV server code free software?
>
> At least some implementations are, e.g., Nextcloud, listed in the FSF
> directory.
>
>> Can you talk to such a server without any nonfree client software?
>
> I do it with Gnome file manager. There is also an o
Hi RMS, Nicolas
The concrete software MobileOrg on Android is somewhat of an orphan.
It may not revive as itself. But there is also a protocol mobileorg,
which the manual alludes to, though does not document directly. That
protocol is very much an enabler of software freedom, and it is
Hello,
Richard Stallman writes:
> What is the source license of Mobile.org?
It is GPL2+.
> Does Mobile.org for Android link with any nonfree libraries,
> such as Google Play Library?
No idea.
> Is it listed in f-droid.org?
Yes, it is.
> If there is a way to use Dropbox (for those operation
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
The crucial question here is whether Mobile.org is free software. If
it is not, then
Hello,
Richard Stallman writes:
> That may or may not be a problem, depending on what it says. Can you
> show me what it actually says about those nonfree systems?
All references are related to the appendix about MobileOrg, an
application for viewing and capturing entries from a mobile device.
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> > Note that the Org manual still talks about iOS and Android, which are
> > not
Nicolas Goaziou writes:
> I removed htmlize URL from the error message. I also demoted the latter
> to a plain message. So, if htmlize is not installed, source blocks are
> not fontified.
I was going to suggest a less harsher and potentially more
helpful approach: in the short term, mirror the h
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 10:22 AM Nick Dokos wrote:
> Why is that a problem? What do we gain by doing that? What do we lose by
> staying put
> on htmlize?
>
> These are not rhetorical questions: I really don't understand the problem.
>
> --
> Nick
I also don't get the problem. The software is fre
Le mardi 18 septembre 2018 à 11:37 +0200, Nicolas Goaziou a écrit :
> I read the thread multiple times already but I do not understand
> exactly the issue risen.
Actually, it's an ethical issue. That are not always easily solved with
technical solutions, I guess…
> From the OP: "Emacs quotes Gith
Eli Zaretskii writes:
>> This is a genuine question: what /exactly/ do you want Org developers to
>> solve, assuming they can? Also, if they cannot, who is willing to give
>> them a hand?
>
> From my POV, the immediate problem is to switch Org-publish from using
> htmlize to htmlfontify. Can thi
Nick Dokos writes:
> Adam Porter writes:
>
>> I'm not an expert on this package nor this situation, however, looking
>> at the htmlize.el file shows:
>>
>> ;; Copyright (C) 1997-2003,2005,2006,2009,2011,2012,2014,2017,2018
>>
>> So it would appear that the package has existed longer than eit
> From: Nicolas Goaziou
> Cc: r...@gnu.org, kaushal.m...@gmail.com, n...@flqt.fr,
> 32...@debbugs.gnu.org
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 11:37:15 +0200
>
> This is a genuine question: what /exactly/ do you want Org developers to
> solve, assuming they can? Also, if they cannot, who is willing to gi
Hello,
Eli Zaretskii writes:
> This is an Org issue, so I would like to hear from Org developers
> before I make up my mind.
I read the thread multiple times already but I do not understand exactly
the issue risen.
>From the OP: "Emacs quotes Github, a non-free platform." If that's the
real pr
Adam Porter writes:
> I'm not an expert on this package nor this situation, however, looking
> at the htmlize.el file shows:
>
> ;; Copyright (C) 1997-2003,2005,2006,2009,2011,2012,2014,2017,2018
>
> So it would appear that the package has existed longer than either
> GitHub or Org. I'm gues
I'm not an expert on this package nor this situation, however, looking
at the htmlize.el file shows:
;; Copyright (C) 1997-2003,2005,2006,2009,2011,2012,2014,2017,2018
So it would appear that the package has existed longer than either
GitHub or Org. I'm guessing that its author moved its pri
> From: Richard Stallman
> Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2018 22:55:15 -0400
> Cc: n...@flqt.fr, 32...@debbugs.gnu.org, m...@nicolasgoaziou.fr
>
> > >From what I remember, there is not objection to use that instead; it's
> > just that someone has to work on converting ox-html to use htmlfontify
> > ins
[[[ To any NSA and FBI agents reading my email: please consider]]]
[[[ whether defending the US Constitution against all enemies, ]]]
[[[ foreign or domestic, requires you to follow Snowden's example. ]]]
> >From what I remember, there is not objection to use that instead; it's
> just
(htmlize-buffer-substring-no-invisible b e)
is this function available in emacs?
if not, it would be good to extract it and put it in emacs, or write
one for emacs.
On 9/13/18, Kaushal Modi wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 13, 2018 at 11:28 AM Glenn Morris wrote:
>>
>> Emacs already includes htmlfontify,
20 matches
Mail list logo
