Hello,
Luke Swart writes:
> There seems to be an error when using hline-relative references in an
> org-mode table’s formula. For example, I have the following org-mode table:
>
> #+BEGIN: columnview :hlines 1 :id global
> | /Project/ | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu
Hi Nicolas Goaziou,
Thanks very much for your clarification:
hline relative references are not allowed on the left hand side of a formula
My error message was user-error: Can't assign to hline relative reference,
which now makes sense. Still, a lot of folks didn’t understand the original
Luke Swart writes:
> Still, I am confused because it seems like org-mode used to allow hline
> references to be assigned, no?
As Carsten pointed out, that was a bug, as Org couldn't expand them
correctly anyway. As a consequence, an error is now thrown.
Regards,
Hello,
There seems to be an error when using hline-relative references in an
org-mode table’s formula. For example, I have the following org-mode table:
#+BEGIN: columnview :hlines 1 :id global
| /Project/ | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat | Sun | /Total/ |
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org writes:
It says that there is a known issue with hline references on the left
side of table formulas, but I did not quite understand the details.
To tell the truth, this is not crystal clear to me either.
There seems to be a proposed fix by
Hello,
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org writes:
Through irc I found someone who tested this with the latest
development version as of now and it instead produces the error: can't
assign to hline relative reference. That also does not seem like the
right behavior to me.
Could
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
Dear list,
Consider the following small org table:
| | grade | weight | weighed grade |
|---+---++---|
| | 5 | 10 |50 |
|---+---++---|
| total | ||
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-
Hash: SHA1
On 26-06-15 14:22, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Marijn Schouten (hkBst) hk...@gentoo.org writes:
Through irc I found someone who tested this with the latest
development version as of now and it instead produces the error: can't
assign to