Rodrigo Amestica writes:
> yes, that's what I did and it works as I expected.
Applied, thanks for confirming!
--
Bastien
At Wed, 06 Nov 2013 14:42:25 +0100,
Bastien wrote:
>
> [1 ]
> Hi Rodrigo,
>
> Rodrigo Amestica writes:
>
> > based on 'printf' type logging I have found one solution that looks to me
> > like a
> > bug fix in org-capture-refile. But I'm obviously far from guessing any side
> > effect that I c
Hi Rodrigo,
Rodrigo Amestica writes:
> based on 'printf' type logging I have found one solution that looks to me
> like a
> bug fix in org-capture-refile. But I'm obviously far from guessing any side
> effect that I could be missing.
>
> In org-capture-refile if I move org-capture-finalize afte
Hello,
based on 'printf' type logging I have found one solution that looks to me like a
bug fix in org-capture-refile. But I'm obviously far from guessing any side
effect that I could be missing.
In org-capture-refile if I move org-capture-finalize after the
save-window-excursion form then the :k
please, no body else having the same issue?
I tried to understand in org-refile and org-capture-refile how is that refile
and closing the buffer intermix, but I'm not that lisp proficient :-(
Then I tried providing some code for
org-capture-after-finalize-hook, and
org-after-refile-insert-hook
Hello,
for some days I have been capturing one of my templates using C-c C-w
(org-capture-refile). This option let's me conveniently select under which exact
header (within the target file) to insert the new entry.
Leaving the target file buffer alive after inserting a new item is inconvenient
in
