Yes, absolutely, it's annnoying. This probably is the bug I reported a
day ago.
But in the past I observed this a bit differently:
Your description is correct, but there is/was a workaround: If you go to
x from the line below (i.e. press cursor left from the beginning of the
next line) it doe
Mail von Nicolas Goaziou, Sat, 24 Oct 2015 at 00:34:54 +0200:
Hello,
> >> commit 4e864643bdb6bba3e000ea51fb746a26e40b1f77
> >> Author: Nicolas Goaziou
> >> Date: Sun Oct 18 09:36:15 2015 +0200
> >>
> >> changes the behaviour of org-return when positioned right after a link with
> >> org-retur
Hello,
"Stefan-W. Hahn" writes:
> Mail von Stefan-W. Hahn, Thu, 22 Oct 2015 at 18:57:08 +0200:
>
> Hello,
>
>> commit 4e864643bdb6bba3e000ea51fb746a26e40b1f77
>> Author: Nicolas Goaziou
>> Date: Sun Oct 18 09:36:15 2015 +0200
>>
>> changes the behaviour of org-return when positioned right af
Mail von Stefan-W. Hahn, Thu, 22 Oct 2015 at 18:57:08 +0200:
Hello,
> commit 4e864643bdb6bba3e000ea51fb746a26e40b1f77
> Author: Nicolas Goaziou
> Date: Sun Oct 18 09:36:15 2015 +0200
>
> changes the behaviour of org-return when positioned right after a link with
> org-return-follows-link set
Hello,
commit 4e864643bdb6bba3e000ea51fb746a26e40b1f77
Author: Nicolas Goaziou
Date: Sun Oct 18 09:36:15 2015 +0200
changes the behaviour of org-return when positioned right after a link with
org-return-follows-link set to t.
The test shows the scenario which now goes wrong:
#+BEGIN_SRC elis