Re: [O] error in tableformula or bug

2011-03-24 Thread Nick Dokos
Nick Dokos wrote: > > @>-1 was allowed only for a short time, this format is flawed. > > Please use @>> instead to mean the second to last row. > > > > I think he wants the penultimate line, not the second line. > ... and I see that's what you said and I misread it: sorry for the noise. Nick

Re: [O] error in tableformula or bug

2011-03-24 Thread Nick Dokos
Carsten Dominik wrote: > > On 24.3.2011, at 10:46, Martin Halder wrote: > > > Hi again, > > > > have traced it down to the following commit which introduces the problem > > (thanks to bisect): > > [3dd474575205d3808390fc6ea2d5feccdb3d4305] Tables: Make @< and $< point to > > row/column 1 in

Re: [O] error in tableformula or bug

2011-03-24 Thread Carsten Dominik
On 24.3.2011, at 10:46, Martin Halder wrote: > Hi again, > > have traced it down to the following commit which introduces the problem > (thanks to bisect): > [3dd474575205d3808390fc6ea2d5feccdb3d4305] Tables: Make @< and $< point to > row/column 1 in a stable way > > Was there a change in th

[O] error in tableformula or bug

2011-03-24 Thread Martin Halder
Hi again, have traced it down to the following commit which introduces the problem (thanks to bisect): [3dd474575205d3808390fc6ea2d5feccdb3d4305] Tables: Make @< and $< point to row/column 1 in a stable way Was there a change in the format or is it really a bug ? Thanks for help, Martin > fo

[O] error in tableformula or bug

2011-03-23 Thread Martin Halder
Hi all, found some strange behavior which was working before as far as I remember.. I am on commit 078c01b. this is working correctly: | 10 | | 10 | | 20 | || | 40 | #+TBLFM: @>$1=vsum(@1..@3) this one with relative indexing (@>-1) not: (value is changing every time the formula is applied: