Re: [O] feature request: best practices for speaker notes and incremental lists/elements

2015-10-24 Thread Matt Price
On Sat, Oct 24, 2015 at 7:54 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote: > Hello, > > Rasmus writes: > > > Matt Price writes: > > > >> I think the two exporters should use the same syntax! I especially think > >> that any future exporters should use a single, unified syntax, and that > >> the older exporters sh

Re: [O] feature request: best practices for speaker notes and incremental lists/elements

2015-10-24 Thread Nicolas Goaziou
Hello, Rasmus writes: > Matt Price writes: > >> I think the two exporters should use the same syntax! I especially think >> that any future exporters should use a single, unified syntax, and that >> the older exporters should eventualyl be changed to support that new >> syntax. And finally, I

Re: [O] feature request: best practices for speaker notes and incremental lists/elements

2015-10-24 Thread Rasmus
Matt Price writes: > I think the two exporters should use the same syntax! I especially think > that any future exporters should use a single, unified syntax, and that > the older exporters should eventualyl be changed to support that new > syntax. And finally, I think the new syntax should be a

[O] feature request: best practices for speaker notes and incremental lists/elements

2015-10-23 Thread Matt Price
In writing ox-md-pandoc, I ad occasion to translate org-reveal's spearker note syntax into html . It revived an older concern of mine, that ox-reveal and ox-deck have different ways of representing near-identical features within org. ** Speaker notes Speaker notes are represented thus for export