Hello,
On 04/02/2016 05:00 AM, Nicolas Goaziou wrote:
Hello,
Charles Millar writes:
[...]
"mysetup" class is
(add-to-list 'org-latex-classes
'("mysetup"
"\\documentclass[fontsize=11pt,letterpaper,twoside=false]{scrartcl}
[...]
\\newcommand\\foo{bar}
Hello,
Charles Millar writes:
> I have a #+SETUPFILE which starts as follows
>
> #+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{lastpage}
[...]
> "mysetup" class is
>
> (add-to-list 'org-latex-classes
> '("mysetup"
>
On Monday, 28 Mar 2016 at 10:54, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
> As we agreed my first successful export was lucky, so I revised that
> file template from which I was exporting - the extra first page and
> the missing\begin{document} do not seem to be a problem now.
>
> However, the LATEX_HEADER:
On 03/26/2016 01:14 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 10:15, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
I was not clear - I ran the exports after I made the correction to
"mysetup", i.e. \newcommand{\\foo}{bar}
but I am confused: why the \\ for foo but \ for newcommand? What is the
On 03/26/2016 01:14 PM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 10:15, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
I was not clear - I ran the exports after I made the correction to
"mysetup", i.e. \newcommand{\\foo}{bar}
but I am confused: why the \\ for foo but \ for newcommand?
My typo. Just in
On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 10:15, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
> I was not clear - I ran the exports after I made the correction to
> "mysetup", i.e. \newcommand{\\foo}{bar}
but I am confused: why the \\ for foo but \ for newcommand? What is the
actual result in the output.tex file?
> I do
Eric,
On 03/26/2016 08:51 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 07:52, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
Thanks for the correction. I escaped the \foo otherwise I had a
spurious "oobar" at the beginning of the exported document so that my
latex class has
\newcommand{\\foo}{bar}
I
On Saturday, 26 Mar 2016 at 07:52, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
> Thanks for the correction. I escaped the \foo otherwise I had a
> spurious "oobar" at the beginning of the exported document so that my
> latex class has
>
> \newcommand{\\foo}{bar}
>
> I suspect that this problem may be file
Hi Eric
On 03/26/2016 05:36 AM, Eric S Fraga wrote:
On Friday, 25 Mar 2016 at 20:56, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
\newcommand\foo{bar}
The problem is this line. The proper syntax is
\newcommand{\foo}{bar}
Thanks for the correction. I escaped the \foo otherwise I had a spurious
"oobar" at
On Friday, 25 Mar 2016 at 20:56, Charles Millar wrote:
[...]
> \newcommand\foo{bar}
The problem is this line. The proper syntax is
\newcommand{\foo}{bar}
HTH,
eric
--
: Eric S Fraga (0xFFFCF67D), Emacs 25.0.92.1, Org release_8.3.4-668-g809a83
"Pushed" the send button too soon
LMDE2
GNU Emacs 24.4.1 (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu, GTK+ Version 3.14.5) of
2015-03-07 on trouble, modified by Debian
Org-mode version 8.3.4 (release_8.3.4-655-g9fb077 @
/usr/local/share/emacs/site-lisp/org-mode/lisp/)
On 03/25/2016 08:56 PM, Charles Millar wrote:
I have a #+SETUPFILE which starts as follows
#+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{lastpage}
#+LATEX_HEADER: \usepackage{scrpage2}
#+LATEX_HEADER: \pagestyle{scrheadings}
#+LATEX_HEADER: \setkomafont{pagefoot}{\normalfont\rmfamily}
#+LATEX_HEADER: \ifoot{foobar}
#+LATEX_HEADER:
12 matches
Mail list logo