Re: [O] iOrg

2016-09-17 Thread Adam Porter
Thorsten Jolitz writes: Hi Thorsten, > iOrg is two things: Thanks, now I understand much better, > From my point of view, Org-mode's greatest strength (being integrated in > powerful Emacs) is kind of a weakness too. Did you ever try to write Org > syntax without any editor

Re: [O] iOrg

2016-09-16 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Adam Porter writes: Hi Adam, > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> [WARNING: this is an extremely long post with lots of boxquotes that >> might turn out unreadable, you might want to consider this as spam >> and just ignore it] > > Hi Thorsten, > > I guess I

Re: [O] iOrg

2016-09-15 Thread Adam Porter
Thorsten Jolitz writes: > [WARNING: this is an extremely long post with lots of boxquotes that > might turn out unreadable, you might want to consider this as spam > and just ignore it] Hi Thorsten, I guess I have missed iOrg before, because this looks very interesting! If

Re: [O] iOrg

2016-09-14 Thread Thorsten Jolitz
Philip Hudson writes: [WARNING: this is an extremely long post with lots of boxquotes that might turn out unreadable, you might want to consider this as spam and just ignore it] Hi Philip, > On 12 September 2016 at 23:10, Nick Dokos wrote: >>

[O] iOrg (was: Programmatically handling org files)

2016-09-14 Thread Philip Hudson
On 12 September 2016 at 23:10, Nick Dokos wrote: > Thorsten Jolitz writes: > >> ... >> >> If you feel you don't need the whole parse tree, but rather want to act >> locally on the Org element at point, you might want to look at >> org-dp.el >> ... > > Just a