Thorsten Jolitz writes:
Hi Thorsten,
> iOrg is two things:
Thanks, now I understand much better,
> From my point of view, Org-mode's greatest strength (being integrated in
> powerful Emacs) is kind of a weakness too. Did you ever try to write Org
> syntax without any editor
Adam Porter writes:
Hi Adam,
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> [WARNING: this is an extremely long post with lots of boxquotes that
>> might turn out unreadable, you might want to consider this as spam
>> and just ignore it]
>
> Hi Thorsten,
>
> I guess I
Thorsten Jolitz writes:
> [WARNING: this is an extremely long post with lots of boxquotes that
> might turn out unreadable, you might want to consider this as spam
> and just ignore it]
Hi Thorsten,
I guess I have missed iOrg before, because this looks very interesting!
If
Philip Hudson writes:
[WARNING: this is an extremely long post with lots of boxquotes that
might turn out unreadable, you might want to consider this as spam
and just ignore it]
Hi Philip,
> On 12 September 2016 at 23:10, Nick Dokos wrote:
>>
On 12 September 2016 at 23:10, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Thorsten Jolitz writes:
>
>> ...
>>
>> If you feel you don't need the whole parse tree, but rather want to act
>> locally on the Org element at point, you might want to look at
>> org-dp.el
>> ...
>
> Just a