On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 6:44 PM, John Hendy wrote:
> #+options: tex:t
Thanks for all the ideas. In the end I found the best way is to use ^:{} as
options, and then use regular subscripts. For chemical formulas works fine.
So that is ABO_{3} and ABO_{3-\delta}.
John
---
On Mon, Apr 21, 2014 at 6:35 PM, John Kitchin wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I often have to use the mhchem latex package to write chemical formulas, and
> I have teh following export issue.
>
> If I have this in an org file:
>
> \ce{ABO_3}
>
> \ce{ABO_{3-\delta}}
>
I've taken to using \( \) around LaTeX s
Thanks. I was going crazy looking for the snippet syntax!
On Tue, Apr 22, 2014 at 8:32 AM, Rasmus wrote:
>#+MACRO: ce @@latex:ce($1)@@
>@@latex:ce{ABO_{3-\delta}}@@
>{{{ce(ABO_{3-\delta})}}}
>
John
---
John Kitchin
Associate Professor
Doherty Hall
John Kitchin writes:
> Hi all,
>
> I often have to use the mhchem latex package to write chemical formulas,
> and I have teh following export issue.
>
> If I have this in an org file:
>
> \ce{ABO_3}
>
> \ce{ABO_{3-\delta}}
>
> this exports as
> \ce{ABO_3}
>
> \ce\{ABO$_{\text{3-}\delta}$\}
>
> Th
Hi John,
John Kitchin writes:
> If I have this in an org file:
>
> \ce{ABO_3}
> \ce{ABO_{3-\delta}}
>
> this exports as
> \ce{ABO_3}
> \ce\{ABO$_{\text{3-}\delta}$\}
>
> The first one is fine, but the second one is not. The nested {} seems to
> mess it up. Is there a way to get this to export c
Hi all,
I often have to use the mhchem latex package to write chemical formulas,
and I have teh following export issue.
If I have this in an org file:
\ce{ABO_3}
\ce{ABO_{3-\delta}}
this exports as
\ce{ABO_3}
\ce\{ABO$_{\text{3-}\delta}$\}
The first one is fine, but the second one is not. T
