Aankhen wrote:
> FWIW, same here. Firefox 3.6.15 on Windows 7. Given that both pages
> specify the MathJax_Math font yet only mathjax.org actually looks like
> it uses it, you’re probably right about MathJax having trouble finding
> the fonts on yours.
>
> I tried a couple other browsers. IE
On Wed, Mar 9, 2011 at 07:43, Nick Dokos wrote:
> Erik Iverson wrote:
>> On 03/08/2011 02:16 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
>> > [snip]
>> > That forces HTML-CSS output and from what I can see on the mathjax site,
>> > that should improve things - but it doesn't for me, so I'm still not out
>> > of the wo
Erik Iverson wrote:
> On 03/08/2011 02:16 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
> > [following up on my post...]
> >
> > One thing that should have helped is to set the mathml option to nil:
> >
> > --8<---cut here---start->8---
> > #+MATHJAX: align:"left" mathml:nil
> > path
On 03/08/2011 02:16 PM, Nick Dokos wrote:
[following up on my post...]
One thing that should have helped is to set the mathml option to nil:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+MATHJAX: align:"left" mathml:nil
path:"/home/nick/lib/mathjax/mathjax-MathJax-20e0cf6
Another advantage of MathJax:
1) It degrades nicely in browsers without MathML (all webkit browsers)
2) Equations are still copy-and-pasteable into Word, if you're into
that sort of thing.
> That forces HTML-CSS output and from what I can see on the mathjax site,
> that should improve things - bu
[following up on my post...]
One thing that should have helped is to set the mathml option to nil:
--8<---cut here---start->8---
#+MATHJAX: align:"left" mathml:nil
path:"/home/nick/lib/mathjax/mathjax-MathJax-20e0cf6/MathJax.js"
--8<---cut here
I had not played with latex fragments recently (= ever since MathJax
became the default back in August 2010 and probably from some time
before that), so based on my previous dvipng-based knowledge, I made an
ill-informed comment on IRC. Nicolas Goaziou corrected me and pointed
out that the default
