Re: [O] makefile regression

2012-05-25 Thread Achim Gratz
Greg Troxel writes: > If GNU make is required it needs to be documented. I've added a comment into Makefile as a stopgap measure. > Separately from that, the makefiles look much more complicated than I > would have thought necessary, and if there aren't good reasons to > require more than POSIX m

Re: [O] makefile regression

2012-05-24 Thread Greg Troxel
Achim Gratz writes: > Could you please state clearly what you want to have changed and > possibly how? You keep wandering back and forth in your arguments, but What I meant was: If GNU make is required it needs to be documented. Separately from that, the makefiles look much more complica

Re: [O] makefile regression

2012-05-24 Thread Achim Gratz
Greg Troxel writes: > I don't really object to using GNU make; enough things require it > (probably emacs does too) that it's already installed. It's more that > "anyone using a makefile will use gnu make" isn't a valid assumption, > especially when the documentation says "type make". [...] Could

Re: [O] makefile regression

2012-05-24 Thread Greg Troxel
I don't really object to using GNU make; enough things require it (probably emacs does too) that it's already installed. It's more that "anyone using a makefile will use gnu make" isn't a valid assumption, especially when the documentation says "type make". At the very start of my Makefile bra

Re: [O] makefile regression

2012-05-24 Thread Bastien
Achim Gratz writes: > At the very start of my Makefile branch I stated that I will use GNU > make since the old make file already used some GNU make features. This > will be documented when it gets released. FWIW, Achim's work on the makefile will be part of Org 7.9, expected to be released in

Re: [O] makefile regression

2012-05-23 Thread Achim Gratz
Greg Troxel writes: > and it seems recent changes have required beyond-POSIX-make features. GNU make is (and actually always was) required for the Makefile to fully work. > This seems unfortunate; I don't understand why building org has to be so > complicated. If it is complicated, it seems best

Re: [O] makefile regression

2012-05-22 Thread Bastien
Hi Greg, Greg Troxel writes: > For a long time, I've been updating org from git every week or two via: > > update-org () { > (cd $HOME/SOFTWARE/EMACS/org-mode && git pull && make) > } > > and I have emacs pointed at that directory. This is on NetBSD where > "make" is BSD make. > > To

[O] makefile regression

2012-05-22 Thread Greg Troxel
For a long time, I've been updating org from git every week or two via: update-org () { (cd $HOME/SOFTWARE/EMACS/org-mode && git pull && make) } and I have emacs pointed at that directory. This is on NetBSD where "make" is BSD make. Today, I updated again and got: make: "/home/gd