Josiah Schwab writes:
>> However, the type="a" thingie in is a bad idea: it is deprecated in
>> the HTML spec, so it would be foolish to go chasing after it in org.
>
> I'll take a closer look the rest of your message to tomorrow, but I wanted
> to mention that while "type" was deprecated in HTM
Hello,
Carsten Dominik writes:
> This is a good point - but this calls for something else: A mechanism
> to name a particular list item and refer to it by name. In LaTeX you
> can put a \label into an ordered list item and refer to it with \ref.
> I am not sure if the new exporter allows this fo
> However, the type="a" thingie in is a bad idea: it is deprecated in
> the HTML spec, so it would be foolish to go chasing after it in org.
I'll take a closer look the rest of your message to tomorrow, but I wanted
to mention that while "type" was deprecated in HTML4 that is no longer the
case i
Josiah Schwab writes:
>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:20, Michael Bach gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of
>>> org-list-allow-alphabetical.
>
> A week or so ago I asked a similar question about the HTML export and lists.
> http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-or
Rasmus writes:
> Josiah Schwab writes:
>
>>> Why doesn't this cut it:
>>>
>>> #+BEGIN_SRC org
>>> 1. <<1>> Do something.
>>> 2. Use your answer in part [[1]] to do something else.
>>> #+END_SRC
>>
>> That will work ok in LaTeX I think.
>> But that will export to HTML like
>>
>>
>> Do somethin
Josiah Schwab writes:
>> Why doesn't this cut it:
>>
>> #+BEGIN_SRC org
>> 1. <<1>> Do something.
>> 2. Use your answer in part [[1]] to do something else.
>> #+END_SRC
>
> That will work ok in LaTeX I think.
> But that will export to HTML like
>
>
> Do something.
>
> Use your answer in part
> Why doesn't this cut it:
>
> #+BEGIN_SRC org
> 1. <<1>> Do something.
> 2. Use your answer in part [[1]] to do something else.
> #+END_SRC
That will work ok in LaTeX I think.
But that will export to HTML like
Do something.
Use your answer in part 1 to do something else.
and the link name
Carsten Dominik writes:
>> a) Do something.
>> b) Use your answer in part a) to do something else.
>>
>> Then, if I want to export it to multiple formats (say, html and
>> pdf), there is no general way to tell orgmode: "my alphabetical
>> bullet choice was meaningful, please try to preserve it".
On 6.6.2013, at 19:39, Josiah Schwab wrote:
>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:20, Michael Bach gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of
>>> org-list-allow-alphabetical.
>
> A week or so ago I asked a similar question about the HTML export and lists.
> http://lists.gnu.o
> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:20, Michael Bach gmail.com> wrote:
>> The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of
>> org-list-allow-alphabetical.
A week or so ago I asked a similar question about the HTML export and lists.
http://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/emacs-orgmode/2013-05/msg01324.html
So I
Marcin Borkowski wmi.amu.edu.pl> writes:
>
> Dnia 2013-06-06, o godz. 09:11:11
> Michael Bach gmail.com> napisał(a):
>
> > Oh, I never saw it handled by the exporter, just a wrong assumption.
> > Just out of curiosity, do you think this could be implemented
> > 'easily'?
>
> If you mean "easi
Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes:
> > Oh, I never saw it handled by the exporter, just a wrong assumption. Just
> > out of curiosity, do you think this could be implemented 'easily'?
>
> I guess it could be - but I am not sure if it should. Conventions about the
type of bullet to be used in
Dnia 2013-06-06, o godz. 09:11:11
Michael Bach napisał(a):
> Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes:
>
> >> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:20, Michael Bach gmail.com>
> >> wrote: The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of
> >> org-list-allow-
> alphabetical.
> >
> > I think it never did. Such a li
On 6 jun. 2013, at 11:11, Michael Bach wrote:
> Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes:
>
>>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:20, Michael Bach gmail.com> wrote:
>>> The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of org-list-allow-
> alphabetical.
>>
>> I think it never did. Such a list is just an ordered
Carsten Dominik gmail.com> writes:
>> On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:20, Michael Bach gmail.com> wrote:
>> The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of org-list-allow-
alphabetical.
>
> I think it never did. Such a list is just an ordered list for export, the
bullet type is just visual sugar in
On 6 jun. 2013, at 10:20, Michael Bach wrote:
> The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of org-list-allow-alphabetical.
>
I think it never did. Such a list is just an ordered list for export, the
bullet type is just visual sugar in the Org buffer.
To force a special bulllet type, you
The LaTeX exporter does not honor the setting of
org-list-allow-alphabetical. It exports ordered alphabetical list as
standard enumerate environment with numbered items.
org-mode 8.0.3
I placed the setq before loading ox-latex. I read in the docstring that
org-list-allow-alphabetical should be
17 matches
Mail list logo
