Bastien writes:
>
> I would first ask myself "what is the new org format for?
> Is it worth implementing this?"
>
> Best,
My motivation is to have an ability to create a virtual org file. My
workflow involves sharing bits and pieces of plain text with non-org
users and, right now, this means h
Hi Tony,
Tony Day writes:
> I'm trying to get my head around what a 'readable exchange format' is.
>
> org-export.el already exports as an elisp list:
>
> M-: (setq my-org-buffer-as-elisp (org-element-parse-buffer)) RTE
>
> ... and it's pretty readable :-)
>
> So the basic idea is that you would
> Bastien writes:
>> In other words, we could then /apply/ org-mode
>> on a document rather than transforming a document into an org
>> document.
> What we may think about is a "Org readable exchange format (oref?)",
> which would take the output of Nicolas' parser, export it in Org-mode
> using
Hi Tony,
tony day writes:
> I've been thinking about a patch for org-mode that would give an
> option to place various org concepts in a drawer rather than
> automatically in the body of the document. The overall idea is that
> for some use cases, it makes sense to disturb the underlying content
Hi,
I've been thinking about a patch for org-mode that would give an
option to place various org concepts in a drawer rather than
automatically in the body of the document. The overall idea is that
for some use cases, it makes sense to disturb the underlying content
as little as possible. In other
